Also known as: actio communi dividundo · partition action · actio familiae erciscundae
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An action in Roman and civil law by which co-owners of undivided property obtain a judicial apportionment of their shares. The proceeding directs a judge to divide the common holdings into separate parcels or, when physical division is inequitable, to order a sale with division of proceeds.
Alan Ackerman and Ariana Azizi own a corner retail strip as tenants in common with one shared parking lot and entrance. Alan sues under the partition action seeking physical division into separate parcels. Ariana shows that zoning requires minimum parking spaces and a shared entrance, so any split would leave one lot noncompliant and unusable. The court orders a judicial sale and divides the proceeds according to ownership shares.
Adam Anderson and Ava Adebayo acquired a lakeside cabin through joint efforts during their relationship but never married. Adam files the partition action seeking division of the property. The court applies common-law partition principles to the co-ownership and orders sale of the cabin with equal division of proceeds after determining the parties hold undivided interests.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Alice Atkins and Anika Anand inherit undivided interests in a family farm as tenants in common. Alice brings the partition action requesting physical division. Evidence shows regulatory limits on water rights and minimum parcel sizes make any split unusable for agriculture. The court orders sale of the entire tract and divides the proceeds among the co-owners.
Partition in kind is the preferred remedy because it allows each co-owner to retain an actual portion of the land. Courts order a sale only when physical division would be unfair or impossible due to the property's characteristics or external legal constraints such as zoning.
Supporting sources
A court orders sale when zoning rules, water-rights regulations, or physical features such as a single shared septic field or elevator core make it impossible to create two usable parcels of comparable value. The presence of these constraints renders any attempted in-kind split inequitable.
Supporting sources
No. Any co-tenant may initiate the action unilaterally. The proceeding determines the form of relief after considering whether a fair physical division is feasible under the governing legal and physical constraints.
Supporting sources
…partition simply because the woman had failed to establish through evidence the requisite "joint venture,” not because the partition action was an improper remedy in nonmarital cohabitation cases. Slocum was recently distinguished in Metten v. Benge , 366 N.W.2d 577, 579-80 (Iowa 1985), in which the Iowa supreme court upheld…