Also known as:actual conflicts · actual conflict of interest
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A conflict of interest that actually affects a lawyer's performance in representing a client. The conflict arises when counsel actively represents opposing interests and takes or omits an action to favor one client over another.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Insurer Sues Insured Client
Anthony Arnold's firm represents both the husband and the insurer in an uninsured-motorist claim. When the husband later sues the insurer for bad faith, the firm must withdraw because the suit creates an actual conflict that cannot be waived.
Codefendant Cross-Examination
Anita Ali and her codefendant share one lawyer at trial. The lawyer declines to cross-examine a witness whose testimony implicates only the codefendant, showing the actual conflict adversely affected Ali's defense.
Sentencing Strategy Split
Angela Acosta's lawyer also represents a codefendant at sentencing. The lawyer withholds mitigating evidence that would have helped Acosta but would have harmed the codefendant, establishing an actual conflict that prejudiced her representation.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Joint Representation Objection
Alexis Archer and two codefendants object at arraignment to shared counsel. The trial court forces continued joint representation, and the actual conflict that later emerges requires reversal without further prejudice showing.
Waiver Rejected by Court
Audrey Ashton and her codefendant both waive any conflict and insist on the same retained lawyer. The trial court still disqualifies counsel because the actual conflict threatens the integrity of the proceedings.
Perjured Testimony Dilemma
Alexandra Armstrong's lawyer learns the client intends to commit perjury. The lawyer's refusal to present the false testimony creates an actual conflict that the court must address before trial proceeds.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What distinguishes an actual conflict from a potential conflict?+
An actual conflict exists only when counsel actively represents opposing interests and the conflict adversely affects performance. A potential conflict is the mere possibility that interests may diverge in the future.
Supporting sources
Must a defendant show prejudice when an actual conflict is proven?+
No. Once an actual conflict that adversely affected counsel's performance is shown, prejudice is presumed and reversal follows without further inquiry into outcome effect.
Supporting sources
Can clients waive an actual conflict?+
Waivers are sometimes ineffective when serious adversity and confidentiality risks arise, especially if one client later sues another or when the court finds the conflict nonwaivable.
Supporting sources
What must a defendant prove to obtain reversal based on an actual conflict?+
The defendant must demonstrate both that counsel actively represented conflicting interests and that the conflict adversely affected the lawyer's performance.
Supporting sources
466 U.S. 668 (1984)Criminal Procedure
…"adequate legal assistance," Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S., at 344, 100 S.Ct., at 1716. Id., at 345-350, 100 S.Ct., at 1716-1719 (actual conflict of interest adversely affecting lawyer's performance renders assistance ineffective). The Court has not elaborated on the meaning of the constitutional requirement of effective assistance in the…