Also known as:adversarial proceedings · adversary proceeding · adversary proceedings
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A contested judicial proceeding in which opposing parties present arguments and evidence before a neutral decisionmaker. The initiation of such proceedings marks the point at which certain constitutional protections attach in criminal cases and triggers specific ethical constraints on judicial and lawyer conduct in civil and bankruptcy matters.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Post-Charge Lineup Identification
Andre Antoine is arrested and formally charged with robbery. Police then arrange a lineup at which the victim identifies him. Because adversarial proceedings have begun, Andre has a right to counsel at the lineup. The identification is later challenged on Sixth Amendment grounds.
Judicial Fiduciary Role Conflict
Judge Angela Acosta serves as trustee of a family trust. The trust later becomes a party to a contested bankruptcy matter pending in her court. The judge must resign the fiduciary position because the trust is now engaged in adversary proceedings before the court on which she serves.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
10
Practice Questions5
· 7 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Model Codes
Hornbooks
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When do adversarial proceedings begin for Sixth Amendment purposes?+
Adversarial proceedings begin upon formal charge, indictment, or other initiation of prosecution. Once begun, post-charge lineups and showups become critical stages at which the suspect has a right to counsel.
Supporting sources
How does the start of adversarial proceedings affect a suspect's Miranda rights?+
A voluntary confession remains admissible after proper Miranda warnings even if police mislead the suspect's lawyer, provided formal adversary proceedings have not yet begun and the waiver is knowing and voluntary.
Supporting sources
What ethical constraint applies to judges in adversary proceedings?+
A judge may not serve in a fiduciary position if the estate or trust becomes involved in adversary proceedings in the court on which the judge serves or in a court subject to its appellate jurisdiction.
Supporting sources
Professional ResponsibilityLawyers’ duties to the public and the legal system · Accepting appointmentsMPREIntermediate