Also known as:appoint counsel · appointing counsel · appointment of counsel · court-appointed counsel · assigned counsel · court-appointed attorney
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An attorney designated by a court to represent a defendant who lacks the financial means to retain private counsel. The appointment ensures representation at critical stages of a criminal prosecution from initial appearance through appeal unless the defendant validly waives the right.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Appointment at Arraignment
Alexis Archer appeared before a federal magistrate on fraud charges and stated she could not afford a lawyer. The magistrate appointed counsel under the governing rule to represent her from that point forward through any appeal. Archer accepted the appointment without objection and proceeded with the case.
Felony Trial Representation
Adrian Aguilar faced state felony charges and informed the trial court he had no funds for an attorney. The court appointed counsel to represent him at trial. After conviction without counsel present, the judgment was reversed on appeal.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Dictionaries
Ava Adebayo was convicted after her appointed counsel failed to investigate key alibi witnesses. She later challenged the conviction by showing the representation fell below professional standards and prejudiced the outcome. The reviewing court examined whether the appointed counsel's performance satisfied constitutional requirements.
Appointment in Parental Proceeding
Amelia Amari faced a state proceeding to terminate her parental rights and requested appointed counsel due to indigency. The court considered whether fundamental fairness required appointment after balancing the private interests, government interests, and risk of error. Counsel was not automatically provided.
Interrogation After Invocation
Adam Anderson invoked his right to counsel during custodial questioning on robbery charges. Police later reinitiated interrogation without counsel present. The statements obtained were suppressed because the appointment right attached and remained in force.
Capital Case Appointment
Anika Anand received appointed counsel in a capital murder prosecution. The court examined whether the representation met constitutional standards given the severity of the potential sentence. The appointment extended through the trial phase.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
At what stages of a criminal case must appointed counsel be provided?+
Appointed counsel must be furnished from the initial appearance through appeal for any defendant unable to obtain counsel. The right applies at every critical stage unless the defendant waives it. This requirement stems directly from the governing federal rule on appointment.
Supporting sources
Does denial of appointed counsel in a felony trial require reversal?+
Yes. When an indigent defendant charged with a felony is denied appointed counsel at trial, the conviction must be reversed automatically. The Sixth Amendment mandates counsel in such cases and treats the denial as structural error.
Supporting sources
Is appointed counsel required in every civil contempt proceeding that may result in jail?+
No automatic right exists in civil child-support contempt hearings even when incarceration is possible. Due process may instead be satisfied by alternative procedural safeguards focused on ability to pay when both parties are unrepresented. Appointment becomes necessary only when those safeguards are absent and fundamental fairness demands counsel.
Supporting sources
When may a lawyer decline a court appointment to represent a client?+
A lawyer may decline only for good cause such as a likely violation of professional conduct rules, unreasonable financial burden, or repugnance that would impair the representation. Mere disagreement with the client's cause or prior public statements does not automatically establish good cause if the lawyer can still provide competent and loyal representation.
Supporting sources
384 U.S. 436 (1966)Evidence
…support its requirement of a knowing and intelligent waiver, the Court cites Johnson v. Zerbst , 304 U. S. 458, ante , p. 475; appointment of counsel for the indigent suspect is tied to Gideon v. Wainwright , 372 U. S. 335, and Douglas v. California , 372 U. S. 353, ante , p. 473; the silent-record doctrine is borrowed from Carnley…