Also known as: blanket prohibitions · blanket ban
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A complete or categorical restriction that bars all instances of a particular activity or form of expression. Such a prohibition is invalid under the First Amendment when it sweeps more broadly than necessary to address a legitimate governmental interest and less restrictive alternatives exist.
Brian Bailey, a solo practitioner, mailed letters offering foreclosure defense services to homeowners whose properties had recently entered default proceedings. State regulators invoked a total ban on all attorney solicitations directed at persons known to face legal problems. Because recipients could simply discard the letters and the mailings contained only truthful information, the categorical restriction violated protected commercial speech.
Brenda Booth placed a newspaper advertisement for her personal-injury practice that included a simple drawing of scales of justice. The state bar enforced a complete prohibition on any illustrations in lawyer advertising. The rule swept too broadly because the illustration was neither deceptive nor inherently misleading, rendering the blanket prohibition unconstitutional.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
A blanket prohibition violates the First Amendment when it categorically bans truthful, non-misleading expression without regard to less restrictive alternatives. Courts have invalidated total bans on targeted direct-mail solicitation, illustrations in lawyer advertising, and leafletting because each lacked the narrow tailoring required for commercial or protected speech.
A blanket prohibition eliminates an entire category of speech or conduct. A reasonable time-place-manner restriction leaves open ample alternative channels and is narrowly tailored to a significant governmental interest. The former is presumptively invalid. The latter may survive intermediate scrutiny.
No. States may require disclaimers or factual disclosures to prevent deception, but a total ban on illustrations or other forms of truthful advertising exceeds what is necessary and violates the First Amendment.