Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A beneficiary or heir entitled to receive distributions of trust income or principal or estate assets. The term identifies those who hold current or contingent rights to property under the governing instrument or intestacy statutes.
Diane Dawson created a trust directing annual income payments to her son David Dawson during his lifetime. David receives the payments each year. He qualifies as a distributee because the trust terms make him immediately entitled to trust income.
Devon Drake established a trust paying income to his brother Darius Dixon for life, with remainder to his niece Doris Duffy if Darius dies first. If Darius's interest ends without terminating the trust, Doris becomes a distributee of the remaining income stream.
Darrell Duncan funded a trust for his daughter that ends when she reaches age thirty. Upon termination the remaining principal passes outright to her. She holds the status of a distributee because termination triggers her right to receive the assets.
After a father's death without a will, his nonmarital son sought to share in the estate as a distributee. The court denied the claim because state law required a formal acknowledgment of paternity that had never occurred.
Robert Lalli claims to be the illegitimate son of Mario Lalli, who died intestate on January 7, 1973, in New York. Robert’s mother, who died in 1968, was never married to Mario. After Mario’s widow, Rosamond Lalli, was appointed administratrix of the estate, Robert and his sister Maureen petitioned the Surrogate’s Court for Westchester County for a compulsory accounting, asserting their entitlement to inherit as Mario’s children. Rosamond Lalli opposed the petition. She argued that Robert and Maureen had not obtained an order of filiation during Mario’s lifetime as required by New York Estates, Powers, and Trusts Law § 4-1.2. Robert conceded the absence of such an order. He presented evidence. This included a notarized document in which Mario referred to him as “my son” when consenting to his marriage. There were also affidavits from individuals stating that Mario had openly acknowledged Robert and Maureen as his children. The Surrogate’s Court ruled that Robert and Maureen were excluded as distributees. On direct appeal, the New York Court of Appeals affirmed the decision. While the case was pending before the United States Supreme Court, the Court decided Trimble v. Gordon and vacated and remanded for further consideration. On remand, the New York Court of Appeals adhered to its prior disposition. The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction and heard the case.
View caseA distributee holds an immediate right to receive trust income or principal under the terms of the trust. A permissible distributee holds only the possibility of receiving distributions at the trustee's discretion. Both categories determine qualified beneficiary status for notice and other rights.
Supporting sources
Yes. Under standard intestacy rules a surviving parent qualifies as a distributee even if the parent had no contact with the decedent. Courts apply the statute mechanically and do not insert additional requirements such as support or relationship quality.
Supporting sources
The representative must send the verified closing statement and an accounting to every distributee. Failure to do so prevents proper closure even if six months have passed and known claims have been paid.
Supporting sources
Yes. The closing statement may note that distribution occurs subject to possible liability with the distributees' agreement. The statement must disclose the arrangement for any undischarged claims.
Supporting sources
…64 Misc. 2d 758, 762-763, 315 N. Y. S. 2d 890, 895 (Surr. Ct. 1970), the court ruled that appellant was properly excluded as a distributee of Lalli’s estate and therefore lacked status to petition for a compulsory accounting. On direct appeal the New York Court of Appeals affirmed. In re Lalli , 38 N. Y. 2d 77, 340 N. E. 2d…