Also known as: dominant lands · dominant estate · dominant tenement
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A parcel of land that enjoys the benefit of an easement burdening a neighboring parcel. The easement is appurtenant to the benefited parcel and passes automatically with its possession unless the creating instrument provides otherwise.
Ridge Retail purchased a storefront whose prior owner had used a rear alley for deliveries under a recorded easement. Stephanie, who owns the servient parcel containing the alley, changed the gate lock and denied access. Ridge Retail obtained a court order confirming its right to continue using the alley for loading and trash removal.
Leslie, Philip, and Rita inherited a farm that held an appurtenant irrigation easement across Colby's land. After they divided the farm into three parcels, each sibling began drawing water through the ditch. Colby could not prevent the subdivided owners from continuing the original use.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Paula Lopez bought a farm whose prior owner had installed a buried irrigation line across Clark's field under a written easement. When modern pumps required higher pressure, Paula replaced the line with larger pipe within the same corridor. Clark could not block the replacement because it accommodated normal development of the benefited farm.
Will and Jean Brown owned parcel B benefited by an access easement over the Voss property. After Brown acquired adjacent parcel C and began using the easement to reach both parcels, Voss sought an injunction. The court enjoined the expanded use because parcel C was not part of the original dominant land.
A hog operation held an easement allowing its odor to cross a neighboring farm. After the hog operation expanded, the farm owner sued claiming the increased odor exceeded the original scope. The court measured the permitted intensity against the normal development of the benefited hog operation.
Pine Play held a prescriptive easement for seasonal foot traffic across Travis's farm to reach training fields. After obtaining a sponsorship, the club proposed grading the path for buses and year-round events. Travis obtained an injunction because the proposed changes exceeded the historic seasonal pedestrian use of the dominant land.
Yes. The easement is appurtenant to the land itself and transfers with possession of the dominant parcel unless the creating instrument or the deed of transfer expressly prevents succession.
Each subdivided parcel succeeds to the same privileges of use that the original dominant owner possessed. Subdivision does not destroy or apportion the easement beyond the original scope.
The court examines whether the right was created to benefit a specific tract and whether it in fact benefits the possessor in the use of that land. Language such as "successors in title" and the functional tie to the parcel confirm the appurtenant character.
The holder may adapt the use to accommodate normal development of the dominant estate and technological changes provided the adaptation remains reasonably necessary and does not cause unreasonable damage or interference with the servient estate.
…appeal from a judgment that denied their counterclaim for an injunction against Will and Jean Brown, plaintiffs, owners of the dominant estate. Defendants requested the injunction to prevent plaintiffs from using an easement appurtenant to gain access to a nondominant estate adjacent to the dominant estate. We reverse and remand…