Also known as:dual-sovereignty · dual sovereignty doctrine · separate sovereigns
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A constitutional principle recognizing that the federal government and each state derive independent authority from their respective sources of power. This structure permits each sovereign to enforce its own laws even when conduct overlaps with another sovereign's interests.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Successive State Prosecutions
Deborah Dunn manipulated natural gas prices through sham trades affecting markets in two states. State W convicted her under its market manipulation statute. State X then brought its own charges based on the same trades. Because each state acts as a separate sovereign, the second prosecution proceeds without violating double jeopardy protections.
Federal-State Successive Charges
Deborah Dunn manipulated natural gas prices through sham trades affecting markets in two jurisdictions. The federal government convicted her under its fraud statute. The state then brought its own charges based on the same trades. Because each sovereign acts independently, the second prosecution proceeds without violating double jeopardy protections.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Printz v. United States521 U.S. 898 (1997)
Municipal Prosecution Bar
Dominic Drake manipulated prices through sham trades affecting markets in two jurisdictions. The state convicted him under its fraud statute. The city then attempted its own charges based on the same trades. Because a municipality is not a separate sovereign, the second prosecution is barred by double jeopardy.
Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York436 U.S. 658, 690, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978)
State Employee Successive Cases
Daniel Diaz manipulated prices through sham trades affecting markets in two jurisdictions. The federal government convicted him under its fraud statute. The state transit authority's parallel charges based on the same trades were allowed because dual sovereignty treats each government as an independent prosecutor.
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority469 U.S. 528 (1985)
Alien Registration Overlap
Devon Drake manipulated prices through sham trades affecting markets in two jurisdictions. The federal government convicted him under its fraud statute. The state then brought its own charges based on the same trades. Dual sovereignty permits the second prosecution because each government is a distinct sovereign.
Hines v. Davidowitz312 U.S. 52, 67 (1941)
State Import Ban Case
Delilah Duran manipulated prices through sham trades affecting markets in two jurisdictions. The federal government convicted her under its fraud statute. The state then brought its own charges based on the same trades. Because each sovereign derives independent authority, the second prosecution is permitted.
Maine v. Taylor & United States477 U.S. 131, 106 S.Ct. 2440, 91 L.Ed.2d 110 (1986)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
Does dual sovereignty allow one state to prosecute after another state has already convicted the defendant for the same conduct?+
Yes. Each state is treated as a separate sovereign deriving its authority from its own people. The Double Jeopardy Clause therefore does not bar the second state prosecution even when the underlying conduct is identical.
Supporting sources
Can a state prosecute after a federal conviction for the identical acts?+
Yes under the constitutional dual sovereignty doctrine, although some state statutes may impose additional limits. The federal government and the state each act as independent sovereigns when enforcing their own criminal laws.
Supporting sources
Does dual sovereignty prevent the federal government from ordering state officials to administer federal programs?+
No. Dual sovereignty addresses only whether separate sovereigns may each prosecute the same conduct. It does not limit Congress's ability to direct state officers.
Supporting sources
312 U.S. 52 (1941)Criminal Law
…where interstate commerce is involved, which are equally applied to the citizen because he is subject, as are aliens, to a dual sovereignty. The Chief Justice and Me. Justice McReynolds concur in this opinion. Footnotes — Dissenting opinion · Stone · [^disA- ] [^disA-1]: Tit. 34 § 1311.1001, Purdon’s Penn. Stat. Ann.,…