Also known as: economic effects · economic substance
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An aggregate market impact arising from intrastate economic conduct that, when considered across all similar actors, substantially influences the supply, demand, or price of goods in interstate commerce.
Edith Eberhardt grows specialty barley on her State X farm solely to feed her livestock. She sells beef and dairy products across state lines but never sells the barley itself. A federal production cap applies to her crop because the aggregate decisions of many farmers like her reduce national demand for grain and alter market prices.
Empire Logistics cultivates a bioactive compound in a basement facility and distributes it free to in-state clinics. The compound mimics a controlled therapeutic drug. A nationwide federal ban reaches the lab because the cumulative output of similar local producers would displace sales and undermine prices in the interstate drug market.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
No. Courts examine whether the entire class of similar intrastate economic activity, when aggregated, substantially affects interstate commerce. Individual proof is not required.
Supporting sources
No. Non-economic conduct such as simple gun possession cannot be aggregated to establish a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce.
Supporting sources
No. When the activity is economic and part of a comprehensive federal scheme regulating a national market, state permission does not insulate the conduct from federal reach.
Supporting sources