Also known as:economic loss rule · economic loss doctrine · ELR
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A doctrine that bars recovery in tort for purely economic losses absent accompanying physical injury or property damage. The rule originated in products liability to keep contract and warranty remedies primary but has been narrowed in some jurisdictions to that setting alone.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Bank Negligence Misstatement
Northgate Bank's compliance officer misread a regulatory notice and told a shared client that Harborview Advisors' license was suspended. The client terminated the advisory contract. Harborview lost only expected fees and sued Northgate in negligence. Because the claim arose outside products liability, the economic loss rule did not bar the tort action.
Excavation Damage Claim
Excavation Technologies struck an unmarked gas line while digging and sued Columbia Gas for added costs and lost time. No equipment was physically damaged. The court applied the economic loss rule to dismiss the negligence claim because the only harm was financial.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Hornbooks
Excavation Technologies, Inc. v. Columbia Gas Co. of Pennsylvania985 A.2d 840 (Pa. 2009)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
Does the economic loss rule apply outside products liability cases?+
In Florida the rule is now confined to products liability. Tort claims arising from contractual relationships are no longer automatically barred by the doctrine itself.
Supporting sources
When does negligence causing only lost profits become nonactionable?+
Negligence that produces purely economic loss from contract termination or interference is generally not actionable absent physical harm or a special relationship creating an independent duty.
Supporting sources
Can a plaintiff recover pecuniary losses in negligence without physical damage?+
Recovery turns on whether the claimed harm is a proven pecuniary loss caused by the tort. Pure economic loss rules may still block recovery when the loss stems from contractual expectations rather than physical injury.
Supporting sources
154 Ill. 2d 48, 607 N.E.2d 1185, 180 Ill. Dec. 672 (1992)Torts
…The Jurisprudence of Classification, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 661 (1989); Bertschy, Negligent Performance of Service Contracts and the Economic Loss Doctrine, 17 J. Mar. L. Rev. 249 (1984); W. Keeton, Prosser & Keeton on Torts §92, at 655 (5th ed. 1984).) For all of that, a punch in the nose remains, for all practical purposes, a tort and not a…