Also known as:emanations · emanate · emanated · emanating · emanation of the state
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A protection or right derived indirectly from the penumbras of enumerated guarantees in the Bill of Rights. The resulting zone of marital privacy precludes state interference with intimate decisions such as contraceptive use by married couples and triggers heightened scrutiny.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Married Couple Challenges Contraceptive Ban
Estelle and Paul Griswold, a married couple, face criminal charges after providing contraceptives to other married persons at their clinic. The state statute directly burdens their intimate marital decision. Because the prohibition reaches the protected zone of privacy, the court applies heightened scrutiny and invalidates the law.
Clinic Directors Seek Injunction
Evelyn and Paul, married clinic operators, face prosecution after advising married clients on contraceptive options inside their facility. The state law directly burdens intimate marital decisions. Because the prohibition reaches the protected zone of privacy, the court applies heightened scrutiny and enjoins enforcement.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Restatements
Dictionaries
Physician Challenges Advertising Rule
Dr. Emerson contests a state order barring distribution of contraceptive information to married patients. The physician argues the restriction burdens protected intimate decisions. The court applies heightened scrutiny to determine whether the rule advances a compelling interest without unnecessary breadth.
State Regulates Medical Practice
A licensed physician operates a clinic providing marital contraceptive counseling between states. State officials attempt to enforce a prohibitive statute against the practice. The court holds that the emanated privacy right reaches such intimate decisions and preempts conflicting state enforcement.
Patient Seeks Declaratory Relief
A married patient claims a federal privacy right under an emanated zone protecting contraceptive access. State courts refuse to recognize the protection. The Supreme Court holds that the right extends to review of state decisions affecting intimate marital choices.
Publisher Faces Privacy Suit
A media outlet publishes materials dramatizing married couples' contraceptive choices. The couples sue for invasion of the emanated privacy zone. The court balances First Amendment protections against the state's interest in regulating the protected intimate decisions.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What is the source of the marital privacy right recognized in Griswold?+
The right emanates from the penumbras of several Bill of Rights provisions, including the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments. Together they create a zone of privacy that protects intimate marital decisions from state interference.
Supporting sources
Does the privacy right apply only to criminal prohibitions?+
No. The right also limits non-criminal conditions attached to government benefits when those conditions directly burden marital contraceptive decisions inside the home. Heightened scrutiny applies whenever the state intrudes on the protected zone.
Supporting sources
How does the emanation concept affect scrutiny of state rules?+
Once a regulation reaches the marital privacy zone, the state must show a compelling interest and narrow tailoring. Mere legitimate interests such as morale or family growth do not suffice.
Supporting sources
381 U.S. 479 (1965)Constitutional Law
…fully meaningful. The foregoing cases suggest that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance. See Poe v. Ullman , 367 U. S. 497, 516–522 (1961) (dissenting opinion). Various guarantees create zones of privacy. The right…