Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A mistaken belief about an existing fact, as opposed to a misunderstanding of legal rules.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Privilege Based on Mistaken Belief
Ezra Eastman confronted an intruder he believed was unlawfully entering his home. The intruder was in fact a police officer executing a valid warrant. Because Ezra's belief rested on a reasonable mistake of fact not caused by his own fault, he retained the privilege to use reasonable force in defense.
Reformation of Ambiguous Will
Emmett Egan's will left his donor-advised account at Helping Hands Fund to one charity. Clear and convincing evidence showed he had opened a second account under a different email address and always treated both as a single charitable resource. The court reformed the will to include the omitted account because a mistake of fact had affected the specific terms.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Dictionaries
Reformation of Trust Instrument
Elena Estrada executed a trust naming one beneficiary for her retirement account. Extrinsic evidence proved she had intended both accounts to pass together and that the omission resulted from a mistake of fact about the number of accounts. The court reformed the instrument to conform to her proven intention.
Mutual Mistake About Cow's Fertility
Enzo Eastwood sold a cow to Elliot Edmonds believing the animal was barren. Both parties shared the same mistaken belief about an existing fact. When the cow proved fertile, the mutual error of fact allowed rescission of the contract.
Sherwood v. Walker66 Mich. 568, 580, 33 N.W 919 (1887)
Mistake in Warrant Description
Ethan Evans obtained a warrant describing a residence by a detailed list of items to be seized. The list was omitted from the copy given to the occupant. The officer's reasonable mistake of fact about the warrant's facial completeness supported qualified immunity for the search.
Groh v. Ramirez540 U.S. 551 (2004)
Erroneous Pricing Index Choice
Everest Holdings and Empire Logistics contracted for aluminum using a pricing formula tied to a particular crude-oil index. Both parties shared an erroneous belief about how the index would reflect existing market conditions. The shared error permitted rescission of the contract terms.
Aluminum Company of America v. Essex Group, Inc.499 F. Supp. 53 (W.D. Pa. 1980)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When does an error in fact excuse criminal liability?+
An error in fact excuses liability when it negates the purpose, knowledge, belief, recklessness, or negligence required for a material element of the offense. The defense succeeds if the defendant's mistaken belief about an existing fact means the prosecution cannot prove the required mental state beyond a reasonable doubt.
Supporting sources
What proof is required to reform a will based on an error in fact?+
Reformation requires clear and convincing evidence that a mistake of fact or law affected specific terms of the document and that the donor's true intention differed from the written text. Direct evidence of intention contradicting the plain meaning may be considered along with other extrinsic evidence.
Supporting sources
Does a reasonable error in fact always defeat trespass liability?+
No. An entrant remains liable for trespass even under a reasonable mistake of fact about boundaries or ownership unless the possessor induced the mistake. The rule places the risk of third-party errors on the person who enters the land.
Supporting sources
66 Mich. 568, 33 N.W. 919 (1887)Contracts
…time the contract is made, but must have been known to one or both of the parties. Where there is no warranty, there can be no mistake of fact when no such fact exists, or, if in existence, neither party knew of it, or could know of it; and that is precisely this case. If the owner of a Hambletonian horse had speeded him, and was…