Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A purpose of supplying reliable proof of a fact or transaction. In the context of the Statute of Frauds the goal is to require a writing that makes successful fraud or perjury unlikely while still allowing enforcement when the writing's contents can be established by other means.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Lost Memorandum Proves Contract Terms
Edith Eberhardt and Emerald Enterprises signed a written memorandum for the sale of commercial property. The original memorandum was later destroyed in a fire. At trial Edith offers an unsigned photocopy and her own testimony describing its contents. The court admits the evidence because the Statute of Frauds requirement is satisfied even without the original document.
Writing Serves Only Evidentiary Role
Evelyn Ellison and Enigma Technologies exchanged several documents that together described the terms of a consulting agreement. When Evelyn later sues, the court treats the writings solely as evidence that the contract was made. It does not treat them as conclusively establishing the terms in the way an integrated writing would under the parol evidence rule.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
10
Practice Questions5
· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Restatements
Study Supplements
Sterling v. Taylor152 P.3d 420, 425 (Cal. 2007)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
Does the Statute of Frauds operate as a rule of evidence?+
No. Although the statute serves an evidentiary purpose by requiring reliable proof of a contract's existence and terms, it is not itself a rule of evidence. Courts may therefore prove the contents of a lost or destroyed memorandum through an unsigned copy or oral testimony.
Supporting sources
How does the evidentiary purpose of the Statute of Frauds differ from the parol evidence rule?+
The Statute of Frauds merely serves an evidentiary purpose to prevent enforcement of contracts never made. The parol evidence rule goes further by determining the enforceable and incontrovertible terms of an integrated written agreement.
Supporting sources
Can a memorandum satisfy the Statute of Frauds even if it does not exclude every possibility of fraud?+
Yes. The writing need only give assurance that the contract enforced was in fact made and provide evidence of its terms. The possibility that some other subject matter or person might also fit the description does not defeat the memorandum.
Supporting sources
What happens when the evidentiary function of the Statute of Frauds is met by other means?+
Courts may dispense with the statute's formal requirements when other evidence fulfills the evidentiary function and the interest in preventing injustice outweighs the statute's protective and channeling functions.
Supporting sources
Business Associations RelationshipsManagement and control of corporations and limited liability companies · CorporationsNEXTGENFoundational