Also known as:ex-delicto · from a tort · arising from tort
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A claim or cause of action arising from a tort or other civil wrong rather than from a contractual promise.
Sources & Authorities· 8 sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Casebooks
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
How it applies
Common Examples
4
Future Lost Earnings Award
Ella Emerson suffered permanent injuries when Echelon Security's employee negligently caused a vehicle collision. At trial the jury calculated her projected lost wages over the next twenty years and reduced that total to present value before entering judgment.
Intentional Withholding of Offer
Elliot Edmonds's attorney deliberately concealed a settlement offer to punish him after a billing dispute. Because the attorney acted with intent to cause harm, Elliot recovered the full amount of damages despite later refusing a renewed offer.
Ezra Eastman was fired after refusing to falsify records. He sued his employer alleging the discharge violated public policy and framed the claim as one arising from breach of a legal duty rather than from any promise in his employment contract.
Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.47 Cal. 3d 654, 254 Cal. Rptr. 211, 765 P.2d 373
Municipal Liability Action
Elena Estrada sued the city after its employees violated her constitutional rights during an arrest. She brought the claim directly against the municipality under a theory that treated the conduct as a civil wrong for which the entity could be held responsible.
Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York436 U.S. 658, 690, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
How does an ex delicto action differ from an ex contractu action?+
An ex delicto action arises from a tort or breach of a legal duty imposed by law, while an ex contractu action arises from breach of a promise contained in a contract.
Can a plaintiff recover full damages in an ex delicto action when the tortfeasor acted intentionally?+
Yes. When the tortfeasor intended the harm or acted with reckless disregard, the plaintiff is not barred from full recovery even if the plaintiff later failed to mitigate, unless the plaintiff intentionally or heedlessly failed to protect his own interests after learning of the danger.
How are future pecuniary losses measured in an ex delicto tort action?+
A lump-sum award for future pecuniary losses is measured by the present worth of the full amount of the loss that would have been received at the later time.
…of the nature of the action contrasts with our Tameny analysis, in which we deemed the public-policy-based cause of action as "ex delicto," or arising "from a breach of duty growing out of the contract," rather than "from a breach of a promise set forth in the contract" or "ex contractu." (27 Cal.3d at p. 175.) As we…