Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A provision of the Statute of Frauds that renders unenforceable an oral contract by which an executor or administrator promises to answer for a duty of the decedent. The rule protects estate assets from unfounded personal claims against fiduciaries and requires a signed writing or applicable exception before enforcement.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Executor Oral Assurance to Vendor
Esme Ellington, executor of a deceased physician's estate, orally told vendor Eastern Electric that she would personally cover unpaid equipment invoices if the company continued supplying the office. Eastern Electric delivered the goods. When the estate refused payment, Eastern Electric sued Esme individually. The court dismissed the claim because the promise fell within the executor-administrator provision and lacked a signed writing.
Administrator Promise to Contractor
Enzo Eastwood, administrator of a decedent's estate, orally assured contractor Evergreen Bank that he would personally pay outstanding renovation debts if the bank completed lobby repairs before tourist season. The bank finished the work. When the estate delayed payment, the bank sued Enzo personally. The absence of a signed memorandum barred enforcement under the executor-administrator provision.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
4
Practice Essays4
· 4 sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Casebooks
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What is the purpose of the executor-administrator provision?+
The provision protects estate assets from fabricated or exaggerated claims after the decedent can no longer testify. It reduces perjury risks in disputes over obligations originally owed by the deceased and prevents executors from being subjected to personal liability based on ambiguous oral assurances.
Supporting sources
Does the executor-administrator provision apply only to pre-existing debts of the decedent?+
Yes. The rule covers promises to answer for duties the decedent incurred before death. Promises to pay for new services performed after death may fall outside the provision if they create an original obligation rather than a secondary one.
Supporting sources
How does the executor-administrator provision differ from the suretyship provision?+
Both require a writing, but the executor-administrator provision specifically governs promises by estate fiduciaries to pay decedent debts while the suretyship provision covers any promise to answer for another's duty. The executor rule focuses on protecting estate administration rather than general secondary liability.
Supporting sources
Can part performance remove a promise from the executor-administrator provision?+
Courts generally hold that part performance does not excuse the writing requirement under this provision. Full performance by the promisee may support equitable arguments in some cases, but the statute's protective policy for estate assets usually controls absent a signed memorandum.
Supporting sources
ContractsDefenses to enforceability · Statute of fraudsUBEFoundational