Also known as:forfeit · forfeits · forfeited · forfeiting · forfeitures
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A penalty consisting of the loss or divestiture of property or a right because of a crime, breach of obligation, or neglect of duty. Title transfers simultaneously to another party such as the government. The concept applies whether the proceeding is in rem against the property or in personam against the wrongdoer.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Vehicle Seizure on Public Street
Flora Ford parked her SUV on a public street outside her apartment. Officers developed probable cause that the vehicle had been used to transport controlled substances. They seized the SUV without a warrant and later discovered additional contraband during an inventory of its contents. The evidence from the inventory is admissible at trial because the initial seizure rested on probable cause that the vehicle itself was forfeitable contraband.
Killer Loses Inheritance Rights
Fiona Foster intentionally killed her uncle, the decedent. Under the governing probate statute she is barred from taking any intestate share, elective share, or family allowance from his estate. The estate therefore passes as though Fiona had disclaimed her interest, and the property is distributed to the remaining heirs.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Common Law
Restatements
Default on Installment Land Contract
Fernando Farrell contracted to buy a parcel from Franklin Foundry under an installment land contract. After making several payments Fernando defaulted. The seller exercised its contractual remedy and terminated Fernando's equitable interest, regaining full legal title to the property without foreclosure proceedings.
Unreasonable Right of First Refusal
Felipe Figueroa placed shares in a family trust that granted his cousin a right of first refusal at a fixed price far below current market value and with a six-month exercise period. Because the price and time terms were commercially unreasonable, the provision operated as a forfeiture restraint on alienation and was subject to invalidation under the applicable donative-transfer rules.
Defendant Silences Witness
Francesca Fiore arranged the murder of a key prosecution witness to keep her from testifying at trial. Because the killing was committed with the intent to prevent testimony, the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing doctrine permits introduction of the witness's prior testimonial statements against Francesca even though she cannot be cross-examined.
Criminal Forfeiture After Conviction
Floyd Franklin was convicted of drug trafficking after the government proved every element beyond a reasonable doubt. The conviction authorized criminal forfeiture of the proceeds and instrumentalities of the offense.
In re Winship397 U.S. 358, 364, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1073, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What is the difference between civil and criminal forfeiture?+
Civil forfeiture is an in rem proceeding against the property itself that does not require conviction of the owner. Criminal forfeiture is imposed as punishment after conviction of the defendant and is an in personam action against the wrongdoer.
Does the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing doctrine require proof that the defendant intended to prevent testimony?+
Yes. The doctrine applies only when the defendant engaged in conduct designed to keep the witness from testifying. Mere causation of the witness's unavailability is insufficient without that specific intent.
When a killer forfeits inheritance rights, how is the estate distributed?+
The killer is treated as having predeceased the decedent or as having disclaimed the interest. The estate passes to the remaining heirs or beneficiaries as though the killer had never been entitled to take.
In an installment land contract, what remedy may the seller pursue upon buyer default?+
In some jurisdictions the seller may terminate the contract and recover possession, causing the buyer to forfeit all prior payments and the equitable interest. Other states require foreclosure-like procedures before the seller can regain clear title.
541 U.S. 36 (2004)Evidence
…to the Confrontation Clause that make no claim to be a surrogate means of assessing reliability. For example, the rule of forfeiture by wrongdoing (which we accept) extinguishes confrontation claims on essentially equitable grounds; it does not purport to be an alternative means of determining reliability. See Reynolds…