Also known as: general-purpose public figure · public figure
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A person who has achieved such pervasive fame or notoriety that the individual becomes a public figure for all purposes. The status triggers the actual malice standard in defamation actions concerning the individual's conduct or fitness.
Gabriella Gomez, a widely recognized actress known across entertainment and media, sued a news outlet after it published claims that she accepted bribes to influence film contracts. The court required her to prove the publisher knew the statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for their truth because her pervasive fame made her a general purpose public figure on any topic.
Gareth Glover, a household-name athlete with national endorsements, sued a magazine after it deliberately changed quotations in an interview to suggest he endorsed illegal betting. The alteration created a material shift in meaning, satisfying the actual malice element required for general purpose public figures.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Guadalupe Gallegos, a globally famous singer, sued a blogger who falsely accused her of cheating on a personal loan unrelated to her career. Because the matter was purely private and did not touch her public role, the court applied the negligence standard rather than actual malice.
Glenn Gross, the longtime governor of a large state, sued a television network after a comedy program aired an exaggerated parody implying he took kickbacks. The court held that the First Amendment barred recovery absent actual malice because his status as a general purpose public figure demanded that protection for expressive speech.
A general purpose public figure has pervasive fame or notoriety across the community at large. A limited purpose public figure has thrust himself into one particular public controversy. Only the former must prove actual malice for all defamatory statements.
Supporting sources
No. The actual malice standard applies to all statements about a general purpose public figure's conduct or fitness. Negligence suffices only for private figures or for limited purpose public figures on matters outside the controversy they entered.
Supporting sources
Recovery requires proof of a false statement of fact made with actual malice. Outrageous parody or opinion that no reasonable person would take as stating actual facts does not give rise to liability.
Supporting sources
No. A scientist who applies for federal grants and publishes in journals remains a private figure absent additional facts showing pervasive fame or voluntary injection into a public controversy.
Supporting sources