Also known as:general testamentary power of appointment · general testamentary powers · general powers of appointment · testamentary powers of appointment
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A power of appointment exercisable only by will that permits the donee to appoint the subject property to the donee, the donee's estate, or the donee's creditors. The power is treated as the functional equivalent of ownership for purposes such as the disposition of ineffectively appointed property and the elective share rights of a surviving spouse when the donee created the power.
See Our Sources· 3 primary sources
Uniform Acts
Restatements
How its tested
Common Examples
2
Elective Share Claim by Surviving Spouse
Gregory Gates created an irrevocable trust funded with his own assets and granted himself a general testamentary power of appointment over the trust property. At his death Gregory's will exercised the power in favor of his children from a prior marriage. Gregory's surviving spouse Guadalupe Gallegos elects against the will and claims a share of the trust assets. Because Gregory was both donor and donee of the general testamentary power, the appointive property is treated as owned by Gregory at death and is therefore included in the elective-share calculation.
Federal Tax Consequence of State Law Ruling
Grace Gupta held a general testamentary power of appointment created by her deceased husband over a marital-deduction trust. A state probate court ruled that Grace's attempted exercise was invalid. The IRS then determined the federal estate-tax consequences of that ruling. Because the power was general and testamentary, the validity of its exercise is governed by the same state-law principles that control outright ownership interests for federal tax purposes.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Bosch387 U.S. 456, 465 (1967)
In 1930 a New York resident created a revocable trust that was amended in 1931. The trust directed income from the corpus to his wife for life. It also granted her a general power of appointment. In default of appointment half the corpus passed to the decedent's heirs and half to the wife's heirs.
In 1951 the wife executed an instrument that purported to release the general power and convert it into a special power. The decedent died in 1957. His estate claimed a marital deduction for the widow's trust on the federal estate tax return. The Commissioner disallowed the deduction under section 2056(b)(5) of the 1954 Code and assessed a deficiency.
The estate petitioned the Tax Court for redetermination. While that proceeding was pending the estate obtained a New York Supreme Court decree declaring the 1951 release a nullity. The Tax Court accepted the decree as controlling and allowed the deduction. A divided Second Circuit affirmed.
The companion case involved the estate of a Connecticut decedent who died in 1958. His will directed payment of estate taxes without proration and created a residuary trust granting his wife a general testamentary power of appointment. The Commissioner disallowed part of the marital deduction. The executor then obtained a probate court order applying the state proration statute. The District Court refused to treat the probate decree as binding on federal tax questions. The Second Circuit agreed the decree was not conclusive.
The two cases reached the Supreme Court after the Second Circuit panels reached differing conclusions on the effect of the state decrees. Certiorari was granted to resolve the conflict among the circuits.
What happens to property when a donee makes an ineffective appointment under a general testamentary power and the instrument names no takers in default?
The ineffectively appointed property passes to the donee or the donee's estate rather than reverting to the donor. Modern doctrine treats the general power as the functional equivalent of ownership, so the property is distributed according to the donee's estate plan.
Must a donee satisfy will formalities to exercise a general testamentary power when the creating instrument requires exercise by will?
Yes. The donee must manifest intent in an otherwise effective document that meets both the donor's specified formalities and applicable state law governing wills. An unexecuted draft, video message, or unwitnessed memorandum fails these requirements and leaves the power unexercised.
Supporting sources
Does a general testamentary power allow the donee to appoint property to a trust or create further powers in another person?
Yes. The donee may make any appointment, including one in trust or one that creates a power of appointment in another, that the donee could have made by first appointing the property to the donee's own estate and then disposing of it as outright owner.
Supporting sources
When is property subject to a general testamentary power included in the donee's probate estate?
The property is not included in the probate estate unless the donee exercises the power in favor of the donee's own estate. If the power remains unexercised or is exercised in favor of others, the property passes outside probate according to the terms of the creating instrument or the default rule for ineffective appointments.
Supporting sources
Trusts and Estates Trusts and Future InterestsFuture interests · Powers of appointmentUBEFoundational