Also known as:gifts inter vivos · inter vivos gift · inter vivos gifts
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A voluntary transfer of property without consideration from one living person to another that takes effect immediately and is irrevocable. The transfer requires donative intent on the part of the donor, delivery of the property, and acceptance by the donee.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Advance on Legacy Reduces Devise
Gregory Gates executed a will leaving one hundred thousand dollars to his employee Isaiah. Several months later Gates wired seventy five thousand dollars to Isaiah with a memo stating advance on legacy. After Gates died the estate treated the wire as satisfying the devise in part leaving twenty five thousand dollars still due under the will.
Trust Transfer Found Illusory
A husband transferred most of his property to a revocable trust retaining full control and income for life. After his death his wife challenged the arrangement as an attempt to defeat her distributive share. The court examined whether the husband had truly divested himself of ownership through a completed gift inter vivos.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Casebooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
Newman v. Dore9 N.E.2d 966 (N.Y. 1937)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What are the three requirements for a valid gift inter vivos?+
The donor must possess donative intent to make a present gift. The donor must deliver the property either actually constructively or symbolically. The donee must accept the gift which is generally presumed.
How does a gift inter vivos differ from a gift causa mortis?+
A gift inter vivos is absolute and unconditional once delivered and cannot be revoked. A gift causa mortis is made in contemplation of imminent death remains revocable until the donor dies and is automatically revoked if the donor survives the peril.
Can a gift inter vivos adeem a devise under a will?+
Yes when the testator indicates in a contemporaneous writing that the gift is intended to operate in satisfaction of the devise. The devisee need not acknowledge the writing for the rule to apply.
9 N.E.2d 966 (N.Y. 1937)Wills Trusts and Estates
…divest himself of the ownership of the property. It is, therefore, apparent, that the fraudulent interest which will defeat the gift inter vivos cannot be predicated of the husband’s intent to deprive the wife of her distributive share as widow.” ( Benkart v. Commonwealth Trust Co. , 269 Penn. St. 257, 259.) In Pennsylvania the…