Also known as: harmless error · harmless-error approach · harmless errors · harmless error doctrine · harmless error rule
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A doctrine in the law of wills that permits a court to excuse a defect in the formal execution of a will when the proponent establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the decedent intended the document to serve as the will.
Hazel Hoffman printed a will leaving her estate to her niece but died before signing it in the presence of witnesses. The niece offers the document for probate and presents testimony from the drafting attorney and two neighbors who heard Hazel state that the document expressed her final wishes. The court admits the will after finding clear and convincing evidence that Hazel adopted the document despite the missing signature.
Husband and wife signed their wills in the presence of two legal secretaries. One secretary signed the husband's will but neglected to sign the wife's will. The court excuses the missing signature after the proponent presents clear and convincing evidence that the wife adopted the document as her will through her conduct and statements at the execution ceremony.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
The proponent must show that the decedent adopted the document as a will despite the formal defect. Courts examine the overall conduct of the testator, including statements of intent, delivery of the document, and surrounding circumstances, rather than isolated formalities.
Supporting sources
No. The doctrine extends to both attested and holographic wills when a defect in execution can be shown harmless by clear and convincing evidence of the decedent’s intent.
Supporting sources
Strict compliance invalidates a will for any deviation from statutory formalities. The harmless error approach excuses the deviation when the proponent proves the decedent intended the document to be the will, focusing on purpose rather than technical perfection.
Supporting sources
Yes. When a testator partially signs the document or otherwise demonstrates adoption through conduct and statements, the absence of a complete signature may be excused if clear and convincing evidence shows testamentary intent.
Supporting sources
…under section 2-503 of the Uniform Probate Code,[^maj-3] which by way of a dispensing power allows a probate court to excuse a harmless error in complying with the formal requirements for executing a valid will, it is doubtful that an unsigned will would be given any effect. See Unif. Probate Code § 2-503 cmt. (amended 1997), 8…