Also known as: impliedly authorize · impliedly authorizes · impliedly authorizing · implied authorization · implied authority
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An authorization inferred from the circumstances and the nature of the relationship rather than stated explicitly. It permits a person to take steps reasonably necessary to carry out assigned duties when the principal has not provided express direction.
Ira Irving hired a lawyer to defend a contract claim. The lawyer filed a motion to extend the discovery deadline after the client missed a meeting. The court accepted the filing because the lawyer reasonably inferred permission to manage procedural timing to advance the defense.
After Congress passed a statute directing agencies to safeguard critical infrastructure, the President ordered the EPA to coordinate with private networks on cyber protections. Courts upheld the order because the statute supplied implied authorization for executive coordination in that domain.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Iris Irons retained a lawyer to settle an estate matter. When the lawyer learned that a successor attorney had been engaged, the lawyer forwarded the file summary to that attorney. The disclosure was permitted because it was necessary to complete the ongoing representation without further client instruction.
No. Rule 1.2(a) requires the lawyer to abide by the client's decision whether to settle. Implied authorization covers only actions needed to carry out the representation, not the client's core decisions on settlement.
Supporting sources
A lawyer may disclose information when the disclosure is reasonably necessary to carry out the representation, such as sharing details with successor counsel or court personnel to advance the matter.
Supporting sources
Implied authorization arises from the principal's manifestations and the agent's reasonable belief about what is necessary to perform assigned tasks. Apparent authority instead rests on the principal's manifestations to third parties that lead them to believe the agent has power.
Supporting sources
No. Under the Youngstown framework, when the President acts contrary to the express or implied will of Congress, presidential power is at its lowest ebb and the action is likely invalid.
Supporting sources