Also known as: incriminate · incriminates · incriminated · incriminating · inculpatory evidence
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Evidence that tends to connect a person to the commission of a crime or to provide a lead to such evidence.
Isabella Ingram was indicted for falsifying rebate applications. An investigator visited her office claiming to discuss new filings but steered the conversation to prior paperwork. Ingram made statements about the applications. The statements constituted incriminating evidence obtained after the right to counsel attached.
Ilana Isaacs was indicted on fraud charges. Officers placed an informant in her cell. The informant only listened and took no steps to prompt remarks. The informant's observations did not produce incriminating evidence because no deliberate elicitation occurred.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Ivy Ibarra and a co-defendant were indicted for conspiracy. Police arranged to record their jail conversation about the charged offense. The recording captured incriminating evidence that violated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Israel Irving was in custody before any charges were filed. Detectives questioned him about a theft without counsel present. The resulting statements were not incriminating evidence subject to Sixth Amendment limits because adversary proceedings had not begun.
Igor Ito was stopped on reasonable suspicion. During a lawful Terry patdown an officer felt a small wrapped package whose incriminating character as contraband was immediately apparent. The officer seized the package without further manipulation and the item became admissible incriminating evidence.
Imani Idowu was taken into custody for questioning about a robbery. Officers elicited statements without advising her of rights. The statements supplied incriminating evidence that required suppression under the Fifth Amendment.
The Sixth Amendment bars such evidence when police deliberately elicit statements after the right to counsel has attached without a waiver. This protection applies only after formal adversary proceedings begin.
Supporting sources
No. An informant must take affirmative steps beyond listening that are designed to elicit incriminating remarks. Passive presence alone does not produce protected incriminating evidence.
Supporting sources
The incriminating character of the item must be immediately apparent from its feel without additional manipulation. Exceeding the scope of a lawful patdown renders the seizure unlawful.
Supporting sources
No. The right attaches only after adversary judicial proceedings have begun. Pre-charge custodial interrogation is governed by Fifth Amendment rules instead.
Supporting sources
…While the admissions or confessions of the prisoner, when voluntarily and freely made, have always ranked high in the scale of incriminating evidence, if an accused person be asked to explain his apparent connection with a crime under investigation, the ease with which the questions put to him may assume an inquisitorial character, the…