Also known as: intermediate-scrutiny · intermediate scrutiny test · intermediate standard of review
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard of judicial review lying between rational-basis review and strict scrutiny. The government must show that a quasi-suspect classification is substantially related to an important governmental objective and must supply an exceedingly persuasive justification that is genuine rather than hypothesized.
Isaiah Ishikawa and Isabella Ingram jointly own farmland and equipment. A state statute designates the husband as head of household and permits him alone to pledge or sell the assets. Isabella sues after Isaiah encumbers the property without her consent. The court applies intermediate scrutiny to the gender classification and invalidates the statute because the state offers no exceedingly persuasive justification tying the rule to an important objective.
Indigo Textiles operates a cable system. A federal order requires carriage of local broadcast stations and displaces fifteen percent of the operator's own programming space. Indigo sues claiming a First Amendment violation. The court subjects the content-neutral rule to intermediate scrutiny, finds that it advances important interests in preserving free television without burdening substantially more speech than necessary, and upholds the order.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Ian Iverson applies to a state-supported military college that admits only men. The institution defends the policy as preserving tradition and producing citizen-soldiers. Ian sues under the Equal Protection Clause. The court subjects the gender classification to intermediate scrutiny, requires an exceedingly persuasive justification, rejects reliance on overbroad stereotypes, and orders the school to admit qualified women.
Ira Irving seeks support for his nonmarital child six years after birth. A state statute bars such actions after six years while allowing marital children to sue at any time. Ira challenges the limitation. The court applies intermediate scrutiny to the illegitimacy classification, finds no substantial relationship to preventing stale claims, and strikes down the shorter period.
Inertia Dynamics, an electric utility, wishes to promote energy-efficient appliances. A state commission prohibits all promotional advertising by utilities. The company sues. The court applies intermediate scrutiny to the commercial-speech restriction, requires the state to show a substantial interest and narrow tailoring, and invalidates the total ban because less restrictive alternatives exist.
Innovate Pharmaceuticals bids on a federal construction contract. A statute awards bonus points only to firms owned by members of designated racial minorities. The company sues after losing the award. The court rejects intermediate scrutiny for racial classifications and requires strict scrutiny instead, holding that all race-based government action must satisfy the higher standard.
Quasi-suspect classifications such as gender and illegitimacy trigger intermediate scrutiny. Content-neutral regulations of speech are also reviewed under this standard.
The government bears the burden of showing an exceedingly persuasive justification. The classification must be substantially related to an important governmental objective that is genuine and not hypothesized.
No. All racial classifications, whether benign or burdensome, are subject to strict scrutiny. Earlier cases applying intermediate scrutiny to certain federal racial preferences were overruled.
Strict scrutiny demands that a classification be narrowly tailored to a compelling interest. Intermediate scrutiny requires only a substantial relationship to an important interest and permits somewhat greater deference to the government.
Yes, when the government demonstrates an exceedingly persuasive justification that is substantially related to an important objective and does not rely on overbroad stereotypes. A statute criminalizing statutory rape only for males was upheld on that basis.
…holding attempted by RFRA. Even assuming RFRA would be interpreted in effect to mandate some lesser test, say, one equivalent to intermediate scrutiny, the statute nevertheless would require searching judicial scrutiny of state law with the attendant likelihood of invalidation. This is a considerable congressional intrusion into the…