Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A principle under which a court disregards evidence of spousal misconduct when determining maintenance, child support, or property division in dissolution proceedings. The principle requires the court to focus instead on financial resources, needs, contributions, and other enumerated statutory factors.
Sources & Authorities· 4 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Uniform Acts
Casebooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
How it applies
Common Examples
5
Maintenance Award Without Misconduct Evidence
Ming Ma petitioned for maintenance after separating from her spouse. She showed insufficient property and an inability to support herself while caring for a young child. The court set the amount and duration of the award after weighing her resources, the time needed for training, and the other spouse's ability to pay, without considering any claims of misconduct.
Child Support Order Ignoring Fault Claims
Madison Meyers sought child support from her former spouse after dissolution. The child had special educational needs and the custodial parent had limited resources. The court calculated a reasonable support amount after reviewing the child's resources, the custodial parent's income, and the noncustodial parent's ability to pay, without regard to any allegations of marital misconduct.
Property Division After Status-Only Decree
Miguel Mendoza filed in State B for division of assets following a status-only divorce entered in State A. The court assigned separate property to each spouse and divided the remaining assets in just proportions after considering duration of the marriage, contributions to acquisition, and future earning opportunities, without reference to any misconduct.
Equitable Apportionment of Assets
Malcolm McKinley sought equitable apportionment of property after a dissolution decree that lacked jurisdiction over assets. The court apportioned the property and assets belonging to either spouse after weighing the duration of the marriage, each party's contributions to acquisition and appreciation, and needs of the parties, without regard to marital misconduct.
Degree Not Treated as Divisible Property
Melissa Mills claimed an interest in her former spouse's recently earned M.B.A. during property division. The court held that the degree was not marital property subject to division and assigned it to the earning spouse after applying the statutory definition of marital property, without considering any evidence of misconduct.
In re Marriage of Graham574 P.2d 75, 77 (Colo. 1978)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
Does a dissolution petition need to allege specific acts of marital misconduct to proceed?+
No. A verified petition alleging that the marriage is irretrievably broken satisfies the statutory requirements when it includes the required background facts and relief sought. The statute abolishes traditional fault-based defenses and does not require pleading adultery, cruelty, or other misconduct.
Supporting sources
How does the court determine whether a marriage is irretrievably broken under a no-fault statute?+
The court decides whether there is any reasonable prospect of reconciliation between the parties. It weighs the separation, lack of communication, and the parties' current positions rather than assigning blame for the breakdown.
Supporting sources
Can marital fault be considered when dividing property after a status-only decree?+
No. The court must divide property without regard to marital misconduct and instead considers factors such as duration of the marriage, contributions to acquisition and appreciation, and each party's needs and future opportunities.
Supporting sources
Does a spouse's misconduct affect eligibility for maintenance?+
No. The court sets maintenance in amounts and for periods it deems just after considering financial resources, time needed for education or training, the marital standard of living, and the paying spouse's ability to meet both parties' needs, without regard to marital misconduct.
Supporting sources
May a court reduce child support because one parent committed marital misconduct?+
No. The court calculates support after considering the child's resources, the custodial parent's resources, the child's needs, and the noncustodial parent's ability to pay, without regard to marital misconduct.
Supporting sources
marital misconduct
, in such proportions as the court deems just after considering all relevant factors. The Act defines
marital
property as follows: “For purposes of this article only, ‘
marital
property’…
. As reflected by the journal entry, plaintiff’s petition was denied on the basis of his failure to “sustain the burden of proof”. The trial court’s action in denying a divorce is asserted…
, after considering all relevant factors including: (1) The financial resources of the custodial parent; (2) The standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage not…
in squandering large sums of
marital
money in risky investments that Wife did not approve; and (2) Husband prolonged the litigation by taking meritless positions. In her sixth point, Wife…
Family LawSeparation, divorce, dissolution, and annulment · Maintenance or alimonyUBEIntermediate