Also known as:moderately forceful · reasonable force
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Force that is neither intended nor likely to cause death or serious bodily harm. Such force may be used to defend against unprivileged contact or to protect land or chattels when the actor reasonably believes it necessary and the intrusion is unprivileged.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Tenant Pushes Past Superintendent
Fiona returned to retrieve her sofa after Ridge Properties removed her belongings without court process. Xavier blocked the basement stairs and asserted the company's claim of right. Fiona pushed past him with moderate force to reach the storage cage and carry out her sofa. The moderate force did not cause serious harm and was directed only at gaining access to her chattels.
Guard Shoves Negligent Intruder
Luis climbed the fence at the freight yard to retrieve his trailer after TransCo refused release over disputed fees. A security guard stepped between Luis and the trailer. Luis shoved the guard aside with moderate force to reach the trailer. The shove was moderate and responded to the guard's negligent interference with Luis's claimed property interest.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Dictionaries
Owner Blocks Chattel Intrusion
Karen cut through a side gate at Republic Cyber's server farm after hours to retrieve her laptop. Guard dogs attacked her on the fenced property. Karen kicked one dog away with moderate force to create distance and avoid further bites. The moderate force prevented the intrusion onto her possessory interest in the chattel without intending serious harm.
Manager Uses Force on Mistaken Intruder
Annie observed Randy unloading boxes in an area of the warehouse not covered by his employer's lease. Randy had formed a mistaken belief about the space due to a mislabeled map. Annie used moderate force by shoving Randy back from the leased space. The force was moderate and neither intended nor likely to cause serious bodily harm.
School Official Applies Moderate Corporal Punishment
A public school official administered moderate corporal punishment to a student for repeated classroom disruption. The punishment consisted of several strikes with a wooden paddle that caused only minor bruising. The student later sued claiming excessive force. The moderate force was applied without intent or likelihood of serious bodily harm.
Ingraham v. Wright430 U. S. 651 (1977)
Federal Agents Use Moderate Force During Arrest
Federal agents entered an apartment to execute an arrest warrant and encountered resistance from the occupant. The agents applied moderate force by pinning the occupant's arms without weapons or strikes likely to cause serious injury. The occupant later brought a civil rights action alleging excessive force. The moderate force remained within the bounds of nondeadly measures during the arrest.
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does moderate force differ from deadly force?+
Moderate force is neither intended nor likely to cause death or serious bodily harm, whereas deadly force creates a substantial risk of fatal consequences or permanent loss of an important bodily function.
Supporting sources
When may a person use moderate force to defend property?+
A person may use moderate force to prevent or terminate an unprivileged intrusion onto land or chattels when the actor reasonably believes the force is necessary and the intrusion is not privileged.
Supporting sources
Does moderate force remain justified against negligent conduct?+
Yes, moderate force may be used to defend against harmful or offensive contact that the actor reasonably believes is threatened by another's negligent conduct, provided the actor cannot safely retreat.
Supporting sources
Is moderate force privileged in self-defense even if retreat is possible?+
Yes, self-defense with moderate force is privileged even if the actor could avoid the necessity by retreating or giving up a right, unless a specific statute imposes a duty to retreat.
Supporting sources
403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971)Torts
…The Law of Torts § 1.11 (1956). [^maj-8]: Although no State has undertaken to limit the common-law doctrine that one may use reasonable force to resist an unlawful arrest by a private person, at least two States have outlawed resistance to an unlawful arrest sought to be made by a person known to be an officer of the law. R. I.…