Also known as: narrowly tailors to a compelling interest · narrow tailoring to a compelling interest · strict scrutiny · compelling governmental interest
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A requirement in strict scrutiny analysis that a challenged law or classification be the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling governmental objective. The government must demonstrate both that its interest is compelling and that no narrower alternative would achieve the same end. Failure to satisfy this standard renders the law or policy unconstitutional.
Neville Norton and fellow Santeria practitioners sought to perform animal sacrifices as part of their worship. The city enacted an ordinance that prohibited only the precise slaughter method used in those ceremonies while allowing comparable secular activities. The court held that the ordinance failed narrow tailoring because the city could not show that banning the religious practice was necessary to any compelling interest in public health.
Norman Nash, owner of a non-minority construction firm, challenged a city program that reserved a fixed percentage of contracts for minority-owned businesses. The city relied only on general evidence of societal discrimination rather than specific findings of past discrimination in the local industry. The court concluded that the set-aside was not narrowly tailored because it was not tied to identified discrimination within the relevant jurisdiction.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Nicole Navarro operated a religious foster agency that declined to certify same-sex couples on faith-based grounds. The city allowed case-by-case exemptions for secular agencies but refused to extend the same flexibility to religious ones. The court found the policy failed narrow tailoring because the city could not prove that denying the religious exemption was necessary to its asserted interest in equal treatment.
Natasha Nielsen operated a website that hosted adult-oriented material accessible to minors. Congress passed a statute that broadly prohibited transmission of indecent content online without providing narrower alternatives such as age-verification requirements. The court held that the statute was not narrowly tailored because less restrictive measures could have advanced the government's interest in protecting children.
Neil Nair sought approval to build multifamily housing in a predominantly white suburb. Village officials denied the permit after evidence showed the decision was motivated by racial concerns rather than neutral land-use factors. The court determined that the denial failed narrow tailoring because the village could not demonstrate that its stated interest in preserving neighborhood character required excluding the proposed development.
Noreen Nguyen and her partner were prosecuted under a state statute criminalizing private consensual intimate conduct between adults of the same sex. The state defended the law as necessary to protect traditional moral standards. The court concluded that the statute was not narrowly tailored because the asserted interest could be achieved through less intrusive means that did not criminalize private adult conduct.
The government must show that the law uses the least restrictive means available to achieve its compelling interest. If less burdensome alternatives exist that would still advance the interest, the law fails this requirement.
Supporting sources
No. A race-based affirmative action program must rest on specific, identified past discrimination within the relevant industry and jurisdiction. General societal discrimination is insufficient to justify the program under narrow tailoring.
Supporting sources
A law fails narrow tailoring when it leaves unregulated secular conduct that produces the same harms the government claims to address through restrictions on religious practice. The presence of such exceptions demonstrates that the restriction is not necessary.
Supporting sources
…law restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples constituted a classification on the basis of sex and was therefore subject to strict scrutiny under the Hawaii Constitution. Baehr v. Lewin , 74 Haw. 530, 852 P. 2d 44. Although this decision did not mandate that same-sex marriage be allowed, some States were concerned by its…