Also known as: doctrine of necessaries · necessaries
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A common-law obligation that holds one spouse liable for essential goods and services purchased by the other spouse. The duty arises from the marital relationship and public policy rather than agency principles. Courts determine liability by examining the need of the purchasing spouse and the ability of the other spouse to pay.
Neil Nair stopped depositing his salary into the joint account and refused to pay for his wife Nicole Navarro's ongoing cancer treatments. Nicole arranged for the treatments on credit from a local clinic. The clinic sued Neil for the unpaid bills. The court held Neil liable under the necessaries doctrine because the treatments qualified as essential medical care that Nicole needed and Neil had the ability to pay.
Nancy Nelson purchased winter coats and school uniforms for her two minor children after her husband refused to provide funds. The retailer sued the husband for payment. The court imposed liability on the husband because the clothing constituted necessaries supplied to the children and the husband possessed the financial ability to pay.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Nadia Novak bought a working furnace and kitchen appliances after her husband withheld funds from the joint account. The supplier sued the husband for the cost. The court found the husband liable because the items were necessaries required for basic household functioning and the husband had the means to pay.
Natalie Norris and her ex-husband shared responsibility for their minor child's medical and funeral expenses after the child's death. The funeral home sued both parents. The court held each parent jointly and severally liable under the necessaries doctrine for the essential services provided to the child.
No. The doctrine imposes liability by virtue of the marital or parental relationship and public policy, not agency authority. One spouse may therefore be held liable even without any actual or apparent authority granted by the other spouse.
Supporting sources
No. Recovery is limited to items that qualify as necessaries, such as food, clothing, and medical care. Items beyond basic support do not trigger liability under the doctrine.
Supporting sources
Courts are reluctant to intervene in ongoing marriages for general support disputes. Liability for necessaries supplied by third-party creditors, however, may still be enforced regardless of cohabitation.
Supporting sources
Yes. The necessaries doctrine imposes joint and several liability on both parents for essential goods and services provided to their minor children, even after divorce.
…his wife, to get rid of all those conjugal obligations which the marriage relation imposes upon him, neither giving to her the necessaries nor the comforts suitable to their condition and his fortune, and relinquishes altogether his marital control and protection, he yields up that power and authority over her which alone…