Also known as:nemo tenetur seipsum accusare · nemo tenetur prodere seipsum · privilege against self-incrimination · right to silence
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A constitutional protection that shields individuals from being compelled to provide testimonial evidence that could be used against them in a criminal prosecution. The protection applies whenever a real and appreciable risk of criminal liability exists. It covers statements or acts that communicate the contents of the mind and extends to state as well as federal proceedings.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Witness Invokes Privilege on Cross
Noelle North testifies on direct examination about her company's occupancy reports. On cross-examination the opposing party asks whether she previously skimmed cash tips and failed to report the income. Noelle asserts the privilege. The court sustains the objection because the question relates only to character for truthfulness and does not waive the protection.
Subpoena for Passphrase Quashed
Nestor Navarro receives a grand jury subpoena ordering him to enter the passphrase that decrypts a server containing logs of alleged illegal activity. He refuses and moves to quash. The court sustains the objection because entering the passphrase would communicate knowledge and control that could tie him to the crime.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
10
Practice Questions5
· 8 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Federal Rules
Hornbooks
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
Does the privilege apply only after formal charges are filed?+
No. The privilege protects any person who faces a real and appreciable risk that answers could be used in a future criminal prosecution. It applies to witnesses in another person's case and before indictment.
Supporting sources
Does testifying on one subject waive the privilege for questions about character for truthfulness?+
No. By testifying on another matter a witness does not waive the privilege against self-incrimination for testimony that relates only to character for truthfulness.
Supporting sources
Can the privilege be invoked to avoid civil liability alone?+
No. The privilege applies only when the risk is of criminal liability. Testimony is incriminating if it would tie the witness to a crime or furnish a lead to such evidence.
Supporting sources
Does the privilege protect corporations or their custodians?+
No. The privilege is personal to natural individuals and does not extend to artificial entities or to custodians acting in a representative capacity.
Supporting sources
Criminal Law Constitutional ProtectionsConstitutional protections of accused persons · Confession and privilege against self-incrimination [Fifth Amendment]NEXTGENFoundational