Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A Latin phrase denoting a finding or plea of not guilty in a criminal proceeding. The phrase signals that the trier of fact has determined the prosecution failed to prove the elements or that a statutory defense such as lack of voluntary act or mental disease or defect has been established. Entry of the plea or verdict bars further prosecution for the same offense under double-jeopardy principles.
Sources & Authorities· 14 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Model Codes
Restatements
Dictionaries
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Acquittal After Insufficient Evidence
Naveen Nanda stood trial for arson after a warehouse fire. The prosecution presented only circumstantial proof that he was near the building. The court found the evidence insufficient to support a conviction and entered a judgment of non culpabilis, barring any retrial on the same charge.
Court Enters Not Guilty Plea
Naomi Norton refused to enter any plea at arraignment on a fraud charge. The court immediately recorded a plea of non culpabilis and set the matter for trial, preserving all of her constitutional rights to contest the government's case.
Involuntary Act Bars Liability
Nora Nash was charged with battery after her arm struck a bystander during an epileptic seizure. Because the movement occurred without any voluntary act, the court directed a verdict of non culpabilis and dismissed the case before it reached the jury.
Formal Not Guilty Plea Filed
Nicole Navarro appeared for arraignment on an embezzlement information. Her attorney entered a written plea of non culpabilis, which became one of the official pleadings that framed the issues for pretrial motions and trial.
Absence of Required Mens Rea
Nicholas Nunez faced securities-fraud charges after he published optimistic projections without reviewing contrary internal data. The prosecution could not prove he acted with any culpable mental state, so the jury returned a verdict of non culpabilis on every count.
Mental Disease Defense Succeeds
Nathaniel Newman filed timely written notice that he would rely on mental disease or defect. After presenting expert testimony at trial, the jury found him not responsible and recorded a verdict of non culpabilis by reason of mental disease or defect.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
What does a verdict of non culpabilis signify in a criminal case?+
It signifies that the defendant has been found not guilty either because the prosecution failed to prove every element or because an affirmative defense such as mental disease or defect was established. The finding bars retrial on the same offense under double-jeopardy rules.
When must a court enter a plea of non culpabilis for a defendant?+
A court must enter the plea when the defendant refuses to plead or when a corporate defendant fails to appear. The entry preserves the defendant's right to contest every element at trial.
How does the absence of a voluntary act affect a finding of non culpabilis?
+
Criminal liability requires conduct that includes a voluntary act. When the harmful movement occurs during unconsciousness or a reflex, the act element is missing and the court must enter non culpabilis.
What mental state must the prosecution prove before a defendant can be found guilty rather than non culpabilis?+
The prosecution must prove the defendant acted purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently with respect to each material element unless the statute clearly dispenses with mens rea. Failure to prove any required mental state results in non culpabilis.
What procedural step is required before a defendant may rely on a mental-disease defense leading to non culpabilis?+
The defendant must file written notice of intent to rely on the defense at the time of the not-guilty plea or within ten days thereafter, unless the court permits a later filing for good cause.
. At the trial, without waiving their demurrer, they objected to the introduction of evidence on the ground that the Code and the National Industrial Recovery Act were unconstitutional. The…
. The government later filed a superseding indictment striking the reference to 18 U.S.C. § 13 and instead charging Stevens with robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2111. Stevens also…
Criminal Law & ProcedureInchoate crimes; parties · Inchoate offensesUBEIntermediate