Also known as: offer and acceptance · offer and acceptance in contract formation · offer and acceptance doctrine · contract formation
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The process by which one party manifests a willingness to enter into a bargain so as to justify the other in understanding that assent is invited and will conclude it, followed by a manifestation of assent by the other party in the manner invited or required by the offer.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Oswald Orozco emails Orchard Farms an offer to buy a rural parcel for two million dollars with closing in six weeks. Orchard Farms replies by courier with a signed acceptance and the deed draft. The binding contract formed by these manifestations of assent triggers equitable conversion so that risk of loss passes to Oswald upon formation.
Onyx O'Reilly mails a signed purchase agreement to Oceanview Properties offering one point five million dollars for a hilltop lot. Oceanview Properties countersigns and returns the document the next day. The resulting contract formed through offer and acceptance causes equity to treat Onyx as owner from that moment onward.
Omar Olson telephones Optima Health with an offer to purchase its surplus medical building for eight hundred thousand dollars. Optima Health responds by delivering the signed contract and keys to the premises. Their exchange of offer and acceptance immediately shifts risk of loss to Omar under the majority rule.
Odin Obeng sends a purchase order to Aluminum Company of America for aluminum at a fixed price indexed to production costs. The company confirms by shipping the first installment. The parties' offer and acceptance create an enforceable contract whose terms later require judicial gap-filling.
Olga O'Neill receives an employment offer from Granite Rock Co. that includes an arbitration provision. She begins work without objection. The offer and her acceptance by performance bind her to the arbitration term under federal labor policy.
Orlando Okafor receives a job offer letter from Foundation Health Psychcare Services containing an arbitration clause. He signs and returns the letter. The resulting contract formed by offer and acceptance subjects later disputes to arbitration.
Conduct constitutes acceptance when it is intentional and the offeree knows or has reason to know the offeror will infer assent from it. Sending files and allowing performance after an offer that invited those acts supplies the required manifestation of assent. The offeree must intend the conduct and understand its inferential effect.
An offer invites acceptance by performance when its language or circumstances indicate that the requested act will conclude the bargain. Submitting sketches and painting a test section after an offer that expressly permitted those acts constitutes acceptance by performance. The offeree need only begin or tender the invited performance.
…Bd. , 331 N.W.2d 740, 747 (Minn.1983), we declined to apply a "conventional contract approach, with its strict rules of offer and acceptance" in the context of public pension entitlements, pointing out this approach "tends to deprive the analysis of the relationship between the state and its employees of a needed flexibility."…
…themselves. The maxim bears less weight when it is applied to dispute resolution than it does when it is applied to questions of
…the final and complete expression of the terms of the parties's agreement. Because the district court decided the questions of contract formation
…in the same degree. "Essentially a sliding scale is invoked which disregards the regularity of the procedural process of the
…agreement. 7. Wrap doctrine: The terms of an offer
Receipt of a clear manifestation that the offeror will not enter the proposed contract terminates the power of acceptance. The rule focuses on receipt rather than the offeree's subjective reading or continued performance. Once received, the offeree can no longer accept by performance or promise.
An offer is too indefinite when its terms fail to provide a reasonably certain basis for determining breach and an appropriate remedy. Essential pricing, coverage limits, and scope details that remain wholly absent prevent the manifestation from being understood as an offer. Open terms alone may also show the parties did not intend a present commitment.