Also known as:prima facie evidence · prima facie standard · prima facie
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An evidentiary threshold that requires a party to produce evidence sufficient, if unrebutted, to support a particular conclusion or finding. The showing shifts the burden of production to the opposing party, which must then introduce contrary evidence or risk an adverse determination. The standard does not shift the ultimate burden of persuasion.
Sources & Authorities· 16 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Hornbooks
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Peremptory Challenge Objection
Paul Peterson, an Asian American defendant in a state criminal trial, objects when the prosecutor strikes every Asian American from the venire. The pattern of strikes supplies the required prima facie showing of racial discrimination. The prosecutor must then articulate a race-neutral explanation for each strike or the court will sustain the objection and reseat the jurors.
Will Contest Filing
Paige Porter petitions to probate a document as the will of her late aunt. She supplies the repository metadata and the aunt's digital signature block as prima facie proof of due execution. The contestant must then introduce evidence of lack of capacity or undue influence to prevent the document from proceeding to probate.
Consumer Goods Warranty Dispute
Penelope Price buys a household appliance whose limited warranty excludes consequential damages for personal injury. When the appliance causes burns, Price sues for those damages. The exclusion is prima facie unconscionable in a consumer-goods setting, so the manufacturer must prove the clause is conscionable or the limitation fails.
Cross-Burning Prosecution
Pamela Phillips is charged with intimidation after burning a cross on a neighbor's lawn. The prosecution offers the act itself as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate. Phillips may introduce evidence that the burning was purely expressive and non-threatening, rebutting the inference.
Insanity Defense Presentation
Pavel Petrov raises an insanity defense and introduces lay testimony of erratic behavior before the crime. The evidence raises a reasonable doubt about sanity. The prosecution must then produce evidence of sanity sufficient to eliminate that doubt or the jury must acquit.
Successive Prosecution Bar
Pearl Porter is tried for two offenses arising from a single sale of narcotics. She moves to dismiss the second count. The government must produce evidence showing each offense requires proof of a distinct fact. Failure to make that showing bars the second prosecution.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
How does the prima facie evidence standard differ from probable cause in grand jury proceedings?+
The prima facie evidence standard requires that the evidence, if unexplained or uncontradicted, would warrant a conviction. It is viewed as substantially more rigorous than the probable cause standard used in federal courts and some states.
Supporting sources
What must a defendant show to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination in jury selection?+
The defendant must produce evidence supporting an inference that the prosecutor exercised peremptory challenges on the basis of race. Once that showing is made, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to articulate a race-neutral explanation.
In a will contest under the Uniform Probate Code, who bears the initial burden on due execution?+
The proponent of the will must establish prima facie proof of due execution in all cases. The contestant then bears the burden of establishing lack of testamentary capacity or other grounds for invalidity.
Supporting sources
When is a limitation on consequential damages prima facie unconscionable under the UCC?+
A limitation or exclusion of consequential damages for personal injury in consumer goods is prima facie unconscionable. The same limitation in a commercial setting is not.
Supporting sources
May a state treat every instance of cross burning as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate?+
No. The state may ban cross burning done with intent to intimidate but may not treat the act itself as prima facie evidence of that intent without allowing proof of an expressive, non-threatening purpose.
Supporting sources
demonstration of need overcame the presumptive privilege and that the requirements of Rule 17(c) had been satisfied. The court stayed its order pending appellate review on the condition…
evidence
tending to prove the contrary; and then whether it come from the one side or the other in weighing it, the…
Civil ProcedureJurisdiction and venue · Federal subject-matter jurisdictionNEXTGENFoundational