Also known as:adverse spousal testimony privilege · spousal privilege · marital privilege
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An evidentiary protection in federal criminal prosecutions that vests solely in the witness spouse the choice whether to testify against the defendant spouse. The witness spouse may elect to testify even without the defendant spouse's consent but cannot be compelled to do so. The defendant spouse may prevent testimony only as to confidential marital communications.
Sources & Authorities· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
Dictionaries
How it applies
Common Examples
4
Willing Spouse Testifies on Deposits
Preston Pratt faces federal charges for skimming resort tips. His wife Pamela Phillips states she is willing to testify about joint-account deposits and on-site observations. Preston objects claiming spousal privilege. The court overrules the objection because Pamela alone holds the testimonial privilege and may choose to testify about nonconfidential matters.
Wife Refuses Adverse Testimony
Pierre Poulin is prosecuted for labor violations. His wife Pilar Pena is subpoenaed but invokes the privilege and declines to testify about farm operations she observed. The court sustains her refusal because the testimonial privilege belongs to her alone and the government cannot compel her testimony.
Defendant Cannot Block Voluntary Testimony
Penelope Price is tried for hacking offenses. Her husband Pavel Petrov receives immunity and agrees to testify about company meetings he attended. Penelope moves to bar all testimony. The court denies the motion except as to any confidential home conversations because Pavel controls the testimonial privilege.
Spouse Testifies on Public Observations
Pamela Phillips is charged with insurance fraud. Her spouse Preston Pratt volunteers to describe staged accident photos he helped create and public conversations about the scheme. Pamela objects to all testimony. The court permits testimony on the nonconfidential observations because Preston alone decides whether to testify.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
Who holds the privilege against adverse spousal testimony in federal criminal cases?+
The witness spouse alone holds the privilege. The defendant spouse has no power to prevent the witness spouse from testifying if the witness spouse chooses to do so.
Supporting sources
What is the difference between the testimonial privilege and the marital communications privilege?+
The testimonial privilege allows the witness spouse to refuse to testify at all against the defendant spouse. The marital communications privilege protects only confidential statements made between spouses during the marriage and may be asserted by either spouse.
Can a defendant spouse block all testimony by invoking spousal privilege?+
No. The defendant spouse may block only testimony about confidential marital communications. Nonconfidential observations and statements made in the presence of third parties remain admissible if the witness spouse is willing to testify.
Supporting sources
Does the privilege apply when the witness spouse has been offered immunity?+
The witness spouse may still invoke the testimonial privilege and refuse to testify even after receiving immunity. If the witness spouse waives the privilege and chooses to testify the defendant spouse cannot prevent that testimony except as to confidential communications.
Supporting sources
May a spouse testify about facts learned outside confidential conversations?+
Yes. Observations made in public settings or in the presence of third parties and information obtained through independent roles are not protected by the marital communications privilege and may be the subject of voluntary testimony by the witness spouse.
Supporting sources
privilege
, communications among jurors, state secrets
privilege
, physician-patient
privilege
, priest-penitent
privilege
). [^maj-39]: Stewart, 83 Colum. L. Rev., at 1392…
testimony
of his wife. 440 U. S. 934 (1979). This calls for a re-examination of Hawkins v. United States , 358 U. S. 74 (1958). I On March 10, 1976,…
covering confidential communications between husband and wife. See Wolfle v. United States , 291 U. S. 7. [^conA-3]: Apparently some nineteen States have either abolished or substantially…
and confidential
marital
communications pursuant to Rule 505 of the Hawaii Rules of Evidence (1985); (13) the benefit of the exemption of real property from attachment or execution under…
EvidencePrivileges and other policy exclusions · Spousal immunity and marital communicationsUBEIntermediate