Also known as:probable-cause standard · probable cause · probable cause requirement
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A legal standard requiring facts sufficient to warrant a prudent person in believing that a particular proposition is true.
Sources & Authorities· 22 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
Study Supplements
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Warrant Issued on Sworn Facts
Federal agents submitted an affidavit detailing surveillance of a warehouse and statements from two employees that Parker Phillips stored stolen electronics inside. A magistrate reviewed the affidavit and found the facts sufficient to believe contraband would be found. The agents executed the warrant and seized the goods. Parker later moved to suppress, arguing the affidavit lacked the required showing.
Post-Arrest Complaint Filing
Officers arrested Phoebe Park without a warrant after she was found with marked bills from a recent robbery. Within hours the prosecutor filed a complaint in the district of the offense that recited the officers' observations and the victim's identification. The magistrate reviewed the complaint and confirmed it met the required showing before the initial appearance. Phoebe's counsel moved for release, claiming the filing was untimely.
No-Contest Clause Challenge
Philip Powell's will left his art collection to his niece and contained a clause forfeiting any gift to a beneficiary who contested the will. The niece filed a petition alleging undue influence by the executor. She presented medical records showing the testator's confusion and prior inconsistent statements. The court found the evidence supplied the required basis and refused to enforce the forfeiture clause.
Informant Tip Evaluation
An anonymous caller told police that Paul Peterson was selling cocaine from his garage and supplied the garage address plus the license plate of a frequent customer. Officers verified the plate and observed short visits consistent with drug sales. A magistrate issued a warrant after applying the flexible assessment that weighs all circumstances. Peterson moved to suppress, arguing the tip alone was insufficient.
Will Contest Under UPC
Perry Pratt's will left his business to a longtime employee and included a clause penalizing any contest. His daughter filed a petition alleging lack of capacity, supported by hospital records from the week of execution and statements from caregivers. The probate court determined the records and statements supplied the required basis and held the clause unenforceable. The employee appealed, claiming the evidence was too speculative.
Prosecutor Charging Decision
A prosecutor received a police report describing a bar fight but no witness could identify the aggressor. The prosecutor declined to file charges, concluding the evidence did not meet the required showing that the defendant committed the offense. The victim demanded prosecution and threatened a civil suit. The prosecutor explained that ethical rules barred proceeding without the necessary factual foundation.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
How does the probable cause standard differ from reasonable suspicion?+
Probable cause requires facts that would lead a prudent person to believe a crime has been committed or that evidence will be found. Reasonable suspicion is a lower threshold that justifies only a brief stop or frisk. Courts apply the higher standard to arrests and warrants because those actions involve greater intrusions on liberty.
Supporting sources
What role does an informant's tip play in establishing probable cause?+
An informant's tip is evaluated under the totality of the circumstances. Veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge are relevant but not rigid requirements. Strong corroboration of predictive details can compensate for weaknesses in any single factor.
When does a no-contest clause in a will become unenforceable?+
A no-contest clause is unenforceable if the contestant had probable cause to institute the proceeding. Probable cause exists when the facts known at filing would lead a reasonable person to believe the will might be invalid. Courts examine medical records, prior drafts, and witness statements to decide whether that threshold was met.
Supporting sources
Does a preliminary hearing finding of probable cause bind later proceedings?+
A magistrate's finding at a preliminary hearing that probable cause exists requires the defendant to appear for further proceedings. The finding does not preclude the government from later dismissing the case or the defendant from challenging the evidence at trial. A discharge for lack of probable cause does not bar a subsequent prosecution.
Supporting sources
May a prosecutor file charges when the evidence falls short of probable cause?+
Ethical rules prohibit a prosecutor from instituting or continuing a charge known to lack probable cause. The rule protects defendants from baseless prosecutions and preserves public confidence in the justice system. A prosecutor who files without the required showing risks professional discipline.
Supporting sources
Trusts and Estates Decedents EstatesWills · Will contestsUBEIntermediate