/pro-FESH-uh-nuhl and AM-uh-chur SPORTS pro-TEK-shun AKT/·statute
Also known as:PASPA
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A federal statute that makes it unlawful for a state or its subdivisions to sponsor, operate, advertise, promote, license, or authorize by law or compact any gambling scheme based on competitive sporting events. The statute also bars private persons from sponsoring or promoting such schemes when they are authorized by state law.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
State Licensing Attempt Blocked
Governor Preston Pratt signs legislation permitting licensed casinos to accept wagers on professional football games. A national sports league immediately sues the state gaming commission. The court enjoins the licensing program because the federal statute directly forbids state authorization of sports gambling schemes.
Racetrack Betting Repeal Challenged
The New Jersey legislature repeals prior restrictions so that racetracks may offer sports wagers to adults. Professional leagues file suit against state officials. The district court grants a preliminary injunction after finding that the repeal still constitutes state authorization prohibited by the federal statute.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Study Supplements
NCAA v. Christie61 F.Supp. 3d 488 (D. N.J. 2014), aff’d, 799 F.3d 259 (3d Cir. 2015)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What conduct does the statute prohibit?+
The statute bars states and their subdivisions from sponsoring, operating, advertising, promoting, licensing, or authorizing sports gambling schemes. It also makes it unlawful for private persons to engage in those activities when the scheme has been authorized by state law.
Supporting sources
Why was the statute held unconstitutional?+
The Supreme Court ruled that the statute violated the anti-commandeering doctrine because it issued direct orders to state legislatures about what they could or could not authorize. The prohibition targeted state legislative action rather than regulating private conduct independently.
Supporting sources
Does the statute apply to partial repeals of state gambling bans?+
Courts have treated partial repeals that permit sports wagering at racetracks and casinos as state authorization forbidden by the statute. Such measures still trigger the federal prohibition even when framed as deregulation.
Supporting sources
138 S. Ct. 1461 (2018)Constitutional Law
…opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined as to Parts I, II, and III. Majority opinion Opinion of Justice Alito The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA) generally prohibits States from legalizing sports gambling. 28 U. S. C. §§3701–3704. PASPA makes it unlawful for (1) a State or any of its subdivisions “to sponsor, operate,…
Constitutional LawThe relation of nation and states in a federal system · Intergovernmental immunitiesUBEIntermediate