Also known as:progenitors · progener · ancestor · forebear
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An ancestor or genetic parent from whom lineal descendants or issue are traced for purposes of class gifts, intestate succession, and disputes over reproductive material.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Class Gift Distribution at Possession
Pablo Perez funds a trust leaving property to his descendants without specifying shares. When the interest vests in possession, the living descendants receive shares matching intestate succession as if Pablo Perez had died then owning the assets. The rule treats Pablo Perez as the designated progenitor whose death triggers the distribution calculation.
Meaning of Issue in Class Gift
Philip Powell deeds land to his issue. The deed contains no contrary language. Under the default rule, issue includes Philip Powell's children and all more remote lineal descendants. The term therefore reaches grandchildren and great-grandchildren as descendants of the progenitor.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Frozen Embryo Disposition Agreement
Penelope Price and Pierre Poulin sign clinic forms before creating embryos through IVF. After separation, Penelope Price seeks implantation under the forms while Pierre Poulin demands destruction. The court first enforces any prior agreement between the progenitors. Absent an enforceable agreement it balances their interests, generally favoring the party seeking to avoid procreation.
Per Capita at Each Generation Shares
Patricia Patel leaves property to her descendants per capita at each generation. At distribution the nearest generation contains two surviving children and one deceased child who left two living grandchildren. The estate divides into three shares: one to each surviving child and one divided equally between the two grandchildren of the progenitor.
Per Stirpes Division Among Issue
Phoebe Park's will directs distribution per stirpes to her issue. She is survived by one child and by two grandchildren from a predeceased child. The estate splits into two shares: one to the surviving child and one subdivided equally between the two grandchildren, repeating the process at each generation from the progenitor.
Origin of Modern Takings Doctrine
A state coastal council defends a regulation by tracing its authority to early nuisance cases. The court notes that those early decisions were the progenitor of contemporary statements that land-use rules advancing legitimate state interests do not effect a taking. The analysis therefore begins with the historical source rather than later formulations.
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council505 U.S. 1003 (1992)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does the default distribution rule apply when a class gift to descendants omits a division method?+
The property passes to living class members at the distribution date in the shares they would receive under intestate succession if the designated progenitor had died then owning the assets.
Supporting sources
What does the term issue or descendants presumptively include in a donative instrument?+
The designated ancestor's descendants of the first and more remote generations, reaching all lineal descendants unless the instrument shows a contrary intention.
Supporting sources
What framework governs disputes between progenitors over frozen embryos?+
Courts first enforce any prior agreement between the progenitors. Absent such an agreement, they balance the parties' interests, with the interest in avoiding procreation generally prevailing absent compelling circumstances.
Supporting sources
How are shares calculated under a per stirpes direction to a progenitor's issue?+
The estate divides into shares equal to the number of surviving children plus deceased children who left surviving descendants, with each deceased child's share subdivided at the next generation until fully allocated.
Supporting sources
505 U.S. 1003 (1992)Property
…similarly situated property." 438 U. S., at 133-134, n. 30. "Harmful or noxious use" analysis was, in other words, simply the progenitor of our more contemporary statements that "land-use regulation does not effect a taking if it substantially advance[s] legitimate state interests' . . . ." Nollan, supra , at 834 (quoting…