Also known as: false light publicity · false light · false light invasion of privacy
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A form of invasion of privacy arising when a defendant gives publicity to a matter concerning the plaintiff that places the plaintiff before the public in a false light. The false light must be highly offensive to a reasonable person and the defendant must have acted with knowledge of or reckless disregard for the falsity and the resulting false impression.
GreenWatch posts an online report that includes Paige Porter's photo, name, and address and labels her a toxic threat because she stores old paint cans. The portrayal exaggerates the risk and reaches the public. Porter sues for invasion of privacy on the ground that the publicity placed her in a false light.
A local station reports that Philip Powell was investigated for workplace misconduct. The report accurately summarizes public records and protected opinion. Powell sues for false light, but the court dismisses the claim because the reporting is substantially true.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
An entertainment network airs a segment on celebrity drug relapses and uses a still image of Piper Patel stepping out of a rehab facility. The narration implies Patel is battling addiction even though she has never used drugs. Patel sues, alleging the broadcast placed her in a highly offensive false light.
A retail chain posts a public training video that uses security footage of Pamela Phillips and narrates that the clip shows a member of an internal shoplifting ring. Phillips has never stolen and the footage shows only routine work. Phillips sues for false light invasion of privacy.
A plaintiff must show that the defendant gave publicity to a matter concerning the plaintiff, that the matter placed the plaintiff in a false light highly offensive to a reasonable person, and that the defendant acted with knowledge of or reckless disregard for the falsity and the false impression created.
Supporting sources
Yes. The claim focuses on the misleading impression created by the publicity, not on whether every literal fact is false. A juxtaposition or caption that distorts the overall portrayal can still satisfy the falsity element.
Supporting sources
No. The tort protects dignitary interests, so emotional distress or harm to personal interests is sufficient even without pecuniary loss.
Supporting sources
The claim is subject to the same actual-malice standard that governs defamation when the matter involves public concern. A plaintiff must prove knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.
Supporting sources