Also known as: races for the record · raced for the record · racing for the record · race to record · race-notice
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An informal contest among successive grantees of the same parcel in which priority is awarded to the first grantee who records under a race statute or to the first grantee who both records and qualifies as a bona fide purchaser without notice under a race-notice statute.
Raphael Rivera received a deed to vacant land from a common grantor but delayed recording for several months. Riley Rivera later purchased the same parcel for value, conducted a title search showing no recorded claims, and recorded the deed within days of closing. When both parties later asserted ownership, Riley's earlier recording secured priority over Raphael's unrecorded interest.
Ronald Reed bought land from a seller who had previously conveyed the same parcel by unrecorded deed to Roberto Reyes. At closing Ronald observed a mailbox labeled with Roberto's name and saw Roberto on the property multiple times. Ronald recorded first but lost priority because the visible mailbox placed him on inquiry notice of the prior claim.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Ravi Reddy obtained a forged deed to an office condo and attempted to convey it to Raven Logistics. Ricardo Rojas later purchased the condo for value, searched the records, found no valid prior deed, and recorded immediately. Ricardo's prompt recording under the race-notice statute gave him superior title despite the earlier forged instrument.
No. A subsequent purchaser must also take without notice of the prior unrecorded interest and pay value. Inquiry notice arising from visible possession or other facts defeats bona fide purchaser status even if the purchaser records first.
Inquiry notice arises when facts visible on the property would prompt a reasonable buyer to investigate further. A purchaser with inquiry notice cannot claim protection under notice or race-notice statutes and therefore loses the race even if recording first.
No. Under race or race-notice statutes the prior grantee loses to a subsequent purchaser who records first without notice. Failure to record leaves the interest vulnerable to later recorded claims that satisfy the statutory elements.
A forged deed is void and conveys no title. A later bona fide purchaser who records first may still prevail under the recording act depending on the jurisdiction's statute type and whether the purchaser lacked notice of the forgery.