Also known as:rational relationship test · rational relations test · rational basis test · rational basis review · rational basis scrutiny
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard of judicial review under which a classification or regulation is upheld if it bears a rational relationship to a legitimate governmental interest. Courts apply this test to classifications that do not involve suspect classes or fundamental rights and defer to legislative judgments so long as the measure is not arbitrary or wholly unrelated to its stated purpose.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Mandatory Police Retirement Age
The city council enacts an ordinance requiring all police officers to retire at age fifty. Officer Rebecca Ross, who remains physically fit, challenges the rule. The court upholds the ordinance because the age limit advances the legitimate goal of maintaining a capable force and satisfies the rational relation test.
Entry Restriction on Foreign Nationals
The President issues an order limiting visas for nationals from several countries identified as posing cybersecurity risks. Rajesh Rao, a software engineer from one of the listed countries, sues claiming religious animus. The court applies the rational relation test and sustains the order because it states a national security purpose rationally connected to the restrictions.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
School Funding Disparities
A state funds public schools primarily through local property taxes, resulting in lower per-pupil spending in poorer districts. Raymond Ramos, a parent in a low-wealth district, sues alleging unequal treatment. The court upholds the system under the rational relation test because the funding method rationally advances the legitimate interest in local control of education.
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez411 U.S. 1, 93 S. Ct. 127, 36 L. Ed. 2d 16 (1973)
Gun-Free School Zones Act
Congress bans possession of firearms within one thousand feet of a school. Robert Rivera, charged under the statute, argues the law exceeds federal power. The court applies the rational relation test in assessing the commerce power claim and finds the prohibition lacks a rational relationship to interstate commerce.
United States v. Lopez514 U.S. 549 (1995)
Differential Insurance Taxation
A state imposes higher taxes on out-of-state insurance companies than on domestic insurers. Reliance Insurance challenges the tax as discriminatory. The court sustains the statute under the rational relation test because the distinction rationally furthers the legitimate goal of encouraging local investment in the insurance industry.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward470 U.S. 869 (1985)
Age Discrimination Remedy Limits
Congress amends the Age Discrimination in Employment Act to allow private damages suits against states. Roberto Reyes, a state employee denied promotion because of age, sues for damages. The court holds that the remedy fails the rational relation test congruence requirement because age classifications receive only rational basis review and Congress identified no pattern of unconstitutional state conduct.
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents528 U.S. 62, 80 (2000)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
When does a court apply the rational relation test instead of strict or intermediate scrutiny?+
The rational relation test applies to classifications that do not involve suspect classes such as race or national origin and do not burden fundamental rights. Gender classifications receive intermediate scrutiny while age and most economic distinctions receive rational basis review.
Does evidence of improper motive automatically invalidate a law reviewed under the rational relation test?+
No. In the immigration and foreign affairs context the court focuses on whether the measure states a facially legitimate purpose rationally related to that purpose even when statements suggest animus. The test does not require proof of perfect motives.
Can a law survive rational basis review even if it is underinclusive or overinclusive?+
Yes. Laws may be imperfectly tailored so long as they are rationally related to a legitimate purpose. Courts permit legislative first steps and administrative convenience justifications under this standard.
How does the rational relation test affect Congress's Section 5 enforcement power?+
Congress may enforce the Fourteenth Amendment only through remedies that are congruent and proportional to identified constitutional violations. Because age and disability classifications receive rational basis review, broad damages remedies often exceed that standard.
539 U.S. 558 (2003)Constitutional Law
…the ground that "[t]he crafting and safeguarding of public morality . . . indisputably is a legitimate government interest under rational basis scrutiny"); Milner v. Apfel , 148 F. 3d 812, 814 (CA7 1998) (citing Bowers for the proposition that "[l]egislatures are permitted to legislate with regard to morality . . . rather than confined…