Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A statutory system for recording instruments that affect title to real property. The system determines priority among competing claimants by establishing which interests are protected against later purchasers and by defining the consequences of failing to record.
Sources & Authorities· 9 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Uniform Acts
Common Law
Restatements
Casebooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Race Statute Priority Dispute
Ravi Reddy conveyed Blackacre to Rita Russell by deed that she failed to record. Reddy later conveyed the same parcel to Roger Ramirez who immediately recorded his deed. Under the applicable race statute Ramirez prevails because he was the first to record even though Russell paid value first.
Chain of Title Notice Issue
Ryan Roberts purchased land from Rebecca Ross whose recorded deed traced back through a common grantor. An easement benefiting a neighboring parcel appeared only in a deed from the common grantor to a stranger outside Roberts chain. Roberts takes free of the easement because it lies outside his chain of title.
Subsequent Purchaser Protection
Ruby Rivera bought a parcel from a seller who had previously granted an unrecorded mortgage to Riverstone Manufacturing. Rivera paid value and recorded without actual knowledge of the mortgage. Rivera holds title free of the mortgage because the recording act protects a subsequent purchaser without notice who records.
Installment Contract Partial Payment
Raven Logistics entered an installment contract for land and paid forty percent before a prior unrecorded claimant appeared. The court awarded title to Raven Logistics but granted the prior claimant a lien on the property to secure the unpaid balance.
Forged Deed Protection Question
A forger executed a deed conveying Rocky Mountain Mining land to Radiant Technologies. Radiant Technologies paid value without notice and recorded. In a jurisdiction applying a race-notice statute Radiant Technologies may prevail against the true owner depending on how the recording act treats the void deed in the chain of title.
Installment Purchaser Lien Remedy
Roger Ramirez paid thirty percent under an installment contract when a prior unrecorded owner asserted title. The court awarded the land to the prior owner but granted Ramirez an equitable lien on the property measured by the payments already made.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
What are the three main types of recording statutes and how do they differ in allocating priority?+
Race statutes award priority to the first party to record regardless of notice. Notice statutes protect a subsequent bona fide purchaser who takes without notice of a prior unrecorded interest. Race-notice statutes require both lack of notice and first recording by the subsequent purchaser.
Supporting sources
How does the chain of title doctrine limit constructive notice under recording acts?+
A purchaser is charged with constructive notice only of instruments appearing in the chain of title through which the purchaser claims. An instrument recorded outside that chain such as a deed from a common grantor to a stranger does not provide constructive notice.
What protection does a recording act give a subsequent purchaser who takes without notice?+
The act protects a subsequent purchaser for value who lacks notice of prior unrecorded interests and who records. That purchaser takes free of the prior unrecorded claim.
Supporting sources
How do recording acts treat a forged deed in the chain of title?+
A forged deed is void and passes no title. In some jurisdictions a subsequent bona fide purchaser without notice who records may still prevail against the true owner depending on the type of recording statute and applicable chain of title rules.
Supporting sources
What remedy applies when an installment land contract purchaser faces a prior unrecorded claimant?+
Courts may award title to the prior claimant while granting the installment purchaser an equitable lien measured by payments already made or alternatively award the land to the installment purchaser subject to a lien securing the unpaid balance.
Supporting sources
recording statute
. Such
statutes
provide that a valid transfer of property may be defeated by a subsequent purported transfer if the earlier transfer is not properly recorded. In Jackson v. Lamphire , 3…
. His claim of title is dependent upon the instrument that was recorded and not the instrument that was destroyed. Assuming that Smith is right in his assertion that the first deed was…
operate to protect the expectations of the grantee and secure to him the full benefit of the exchange for which he bargained. ( Wayt v. Patee (1928) 205 Cal. 46, 49 [269 P. 660]; Doo v.…
the restrictions. " [T]he
recording statutes
operate to protect the expectations of the grantee and secure to him the full benefit of the exchange for which he bargained. [Citations.] Where, however, mutually enforceable equitable…
Real PropertyMortgages/security devices · Discharge of the mortgageUBEIntermediate