Also known as:relates back · relate back · related back · relating back · relation-back · relation-back doctrine
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A doctrine under which a later act is treated as having occurred at an earlier time. In civil procedure an amended pleading is deemed filed on the date of the original pleading when the amendment asserts a claim or defense arising from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence. Relation back is also permitted when the law supplying the applicable statute of limitations so provides.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
State Limitations Permits Relation Back
Ryan Roberts filed a complaint against Reliance Insurance alleging breach of an insurance contract arising from a fire loss. After the state statute of limitations expired Ryan sought to amend to add a bad-faith claim that grew out of the same loss. Because the controlling state limitations law expressly permits relation back the court allowed the amendment to be treated as filed on the original date.
Identification Relation Back in Trial
Roger Ramirez was tried for robbery. The prosecution introduced evidence of a later identification that related back to an initial lineup. The court permitted the later identification to be treated as occurring at the time of the first identification for purposes of evaluating its reliability.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
United States v. Stevens559 U.S. 460 (2010)
Tippee Duty Relation Back Analysis
Robert Rivera received inside information from a corporate insider and traded on it. The court examined whether the tippee's duty to disclose or abstain related back to the insider's original breach. The analysis treated the tippee's obligation as arising at the moment the improper disclosure occurred.
Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission463 U.S. 646, 655, n.14 (1983)
Paternity Acknowledgment Relation Back
Ricardo Rojas sought to inherit from his deceased father. An acknowledgment of paternity executed after the father's death was held to relate back to the date of the father's death under state law thereby validating the inheritance claim.
Lalli v. Lalli439 U.S. 259 (1978)
Class Action Relation Back on Mootness
Roberto Reyes brought a class action challenging parole procedures. After his individual claim became moot the court allowed the action to continue because the class claims related back to the filing of the original complaint preserving the controversy.
United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty445 U.S. 388, 400 (1980)
Prejudgment Attachment Relation Back
Renata Russo obtained a prejudgment attachment on property. When the underlying claim was later reduced to judgment the lien was treated as relating back to the date of the original attachment thereby establishing priority over intervening creditors.
Connecticut v. Doehr501 U.S. 1 (1991)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
When does an amended pleading relate back under Rule 15(c)?+
An amendment relates back when it asserts a claim arising from the same conduct transaction or occurrence set out in the original pleading. For new parties the added defendant must have received notice within the Rule 4(m) period and known that but for a mistake it would have been named originally.
Supporting sources
Does state law ever control relation back?+
Yes. Rule 15(c)(1)(A) directs the court to apply the relation-back rule supplied by the law that governs the statute of limitations when that law is more generous than the federal rule.
Supporting sources
What is the key inquiry when adding a new defendant?+
The focus is on what the party to be added knew or should have known within the Rule 4(m) period not on the plaintiff's diligence or knowledge.
Supporting sources
Can relation back cure lack of capacity?+
Courts have sometimes allowed relation back to cure a plaintiff's lack of capacity when the amendment is filed after the limitations period but before dismissal.
Supporting sources
419 U.S. 393 (1975)Constitutional Law
…court can reasonably be expected to rule on a certification motion. In such instances, whether the certification can be said to "relate back" to the filing of the complaint may depend upon the circumstances of the particular case and especially the reality of the claim that otherwise the issue would evade review. [^maj-12]:…