Also known as:spousal elections · spouse election · elective share · right of election
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A statutory right of a surviving spouse to claim a fractional share of the decedent's augmented estate in lieu of taking under the will or by intestacy. The right may be waived only by a signed written agreement and is forfeited by a spouse who feloniously and intentionally kills the decedent.
Sources & Authorities· 8 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Study Supplements
How it applies
Common Examples
3
Mid-Marriage Waiver Agreement
Sebastian Santos and his wife Sasha Stone signed a one-page agreement during their marriage in which Sebastian accepted a lump-sum payment in lieu of any claim to Sasha's estate. After Sasha died, Sebastian filed a petition for an elective share. The court enforced the signed writing and denied the petition because the agreement satisfied the statutory requirements for waiver.
Slayer Forfeiture of Election
Simon Stern was convicted of feloniously and intentionally killing his wife Simone Sanders. Simon petitioned the probate court for an elective share of Simone's estate. The court denied the petition because the statute bars any person who feloniously and intentionally kills the decedent from receiving an elective share or any other benefit from the estate.
Inter Vivos Transfers to Defeat Share
Samuel Soto transferred most of his assets into revocable trusts shortly before his death, leaving little in his probate estate for his surviving spouse Sasha Stone. Sasha petitioned for an elective share. The court examined the substance of the transfers and included the trust assets in the augmented estate available for the elective share calculation.
Newman v. Dore9 N.E.2d 966 (N.Y. 1937)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
May a surviving spouse receive homestead allowance, exempt property, and family allowance in addition to an elective share?+
Yes. The allowances are independent entitlements and are not charged against the elective share amount. A surviving spouse may therefore obtain both the fractional share of the augmented estate and the fixed allowances without reduction of one by the other.
Supporting sources
When must a surviving spouse file a petition for an elective share to preserve nonprobate transfers in the augmented estate?+
The petition must be filed within nine months after the date of death or within six months after probate, whichever period expires later. Filing more than nine months after death excludes nonprobate transfers from the augmented estate even if the later six-month period is met.
Supporting sources
Is a mid-marriage written agreement waiving elective share rights enforceable without consideration or full financial disclosure?+
The statute requires only a signed writing by the surviving spouse and states that the agreement is enforceable without consideration. Courts may still examine fairness factors such as disclosure when the surviving spouse challenges enforceability on grounds of duress or involuntariness.
Supporting sources
Does a spouse who feloniously and intentionally kills the decedent forfeit the right of election?+
Yes. The statute provides that such a killer forfeits every benefit under the article, expressly including an elective share. The estate then passes as if the killer had disclaimed the share.
Supporting sources
May a surviving spouse waive all elective share rights through a complete property settlement entered into in anticipation of divorce?+
Yes. Unless the agreement provides otherwise, a complete property settlement entered into after or in anticipation of separation or divorce constitutes a waiver of all rights of elective share, homestead allowance, exempt property, and family allowance.
Supporting sources
a
right of election
to take against the will, had been enacted as § 18 of the Decedent Estate Law on March 29, 1929, but it did not become effective until September 1, 1930, a few days after McGlone executed…
spouse
, had a
right of election
to take an
elective share
amount of the augmented estate, any attempt to transfer the real property into joint tenancy with McLaen was void because Tyson Hall did not join in the…
( Hammond v. Hopkins , 143 U. S. 224; Kahn v. Chapin , 152 N. Y. 305, 309). It might adopt or reject the purchase. Neither adoption nor rejection would be a change of the contract. It…
Trusts and Estates Decedents EstatesWills · Construction problemsUBEIntermediate