Also known as:subsequently negligent · last clear chance doctrine
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Conduct by one party occurring after another party's contributory negligence has placed the latter in peril. The later conduct supplies a last clear chance to avoid harm when the imperiled party cannot extricate himself by reasonable care and the later actor fails to use an available opportunity to prevent injury.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Pinned Worker and Delayed Shutdown
Santiago Sanchez bypassed a required safety lockout and entered an active turbine nacelle during high winds. He slipped and became trapped with his legs exposed to the rotating blades. Simon Stern monitored the control console and received repeated alerts showing the obstruction but postponed review to avoid an output interruption. When Stern finally initiated the shutdown the blades struck Sanchez, causing serious injury.
Initial Injury and Third-Party Collision
Sylvia Santos negligently crossed an icy walkway she knew was hazardous and fractured her leg. While recovering in a cast she was struck by a vehicle driven by a third party who failed to brake in time. The fracture had left Santos unable to move quickly enough to reach safety.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Dictionaries
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
Does a plaintiff's contributory negligence bar recovery when the defendant's negligence occurs later in time?+
No. Under the last clear chance doctrine a plaintiff who negligently placed himself in peril may still recover if he was unable to avoid the harm by reasonable care immediately before the injury and the defendant failed to use a then-existing opportunity to prevent it.
What must a plaintiff show to invoke last clear chance against a defendant whose negligence came after the plaintiff's own fault?+
The plaintiff must establish that he could not avoid the harm by reasonable vigilance immediately before the injury and that the defendant negligently failed to use an available opportunity to avert it.
Does the Restatement take a position on whether an initial tortfeasor remains liable when a third person later negligently harms the already-injured plaintiff?+
No. The Institute expresses no opinion on that question.
…outline of the specific form to be adopted. Although several states which apply comparative negligence concepts retain the last clear chance doctrine (see Schwartz, supra , § 7.2, p. 134), the better reasoned position seems to be that when true comparative negligence is adopted, the need for lastclearchance as a palliative of the…
TortsNegligence · Pure and modified comparative negligence, including secondary implied assumption of riskNEXTGENFoundational