Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A court's authority to adjudicate disputes involving persons or property located within a specified geographic area. The authority rests on a connection between the forum and the defendant or the events giving rise to the claim. Without such a connection the resulting judgment violates due process and lacks enforceability elsewhere.
Sources & Authorities· 4 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Statutes
Federal Rules
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Judicial Notice of Local Traffic Patterns
Tabitha Taylor sues a university in federal court in State A after an assault on the main campus quad. She asks the court to notice that the quad is the busiest pedestrian area on campus during class changes. The court grants the request because the fact is generally known within the trial court's territorial jurisdiction and requires no further proof.
Minimum Contacts for Shoe Sales
Trailblazer Airlines, incorporated elsewhere, maintains a sales office and solicits business continuously in State B. A resident injured on one of its flights sues there. The court exercises territorial jurisdiction because the airline's systematic contacts with the state make it fair to require the company to defend the action locally.
International Shoe Co. v. Washington326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945)
Mayor Judging Outside Village Limits
Tori Taylor is tried before a village mayor for an offense committed miles away in the same county. She objects that the mayor lacks power over the location of the alleged conduct. The court holds that the state may confer territorial jurisdiction on its courts as it chooses, so the mayor may hear the case.
Tumey v. Ohio273 U.S. 510 (1927)
Stock Certificates and Forum Power
Terra Financial holds shares in a Delaware corporation. A plaintiff seeks to attach those shares in Delaware to obtain jurisdiction over the out-of-state owner. The court refuses because the certificates are not physically present in Delaware and the owner lacks minimum contacts with the state.
Shaffer v. Heitner433 U.S. 186 (1977)
Local School Board Flag Rule
Tanya Tang's children attend a small rural school whose board requires flag salutes. She challenges the rule as violating free speech. The board claims its limited territorial jurisdiction insulates the policy from constitutional review. The court rejects the claim because even small local authorities must respect constitutional limits within their geographic reach.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)
Alien Detention Beyond Borders
Theo Thomas, a foreign national captured abroad, petitions for habeas relief in a U.S. district court. The government argues the court lacks power because the detention occurred outside any U.S. territory. The court agrees that its territorial jurisdiction does not extend to an alien held in a foreign country with no prior connection to the United States.
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain542 U.S. 692 (2004)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
How does territorial jurisdiction differ from subject-matter jurisdiction?+
Territorial jurisdiction concerns the geographic connection between the court and the defendant or the events. Subject-matter jurisdiction concerns the court's power to hear the type of case presented. Both must be satisfied before a court may proceed.
Supporting sources
What happens when a judgment is entered without territorial jurisdiction?+
The judgment violates the defendant's due-process rights and may be attacked collaterally in another forum. Most other defects must be raised on direct appeal, but lack of territorial jurisdiction remains available as a defense even after the judgment becomes final.
When may a court take judicial notice of facts under the territorial-jurisdiction standard?+
A court may notice an adjudicative fact that is generally known within the trial court's territorial jurisdiction or readily verifiable from unquestionable sources. The fact must not be subject to reasonable dispute.
Supporting sources
Does the presence of property alone support territorial jurisdiction today?+
No. The mere presence of property is insufficient unless the defendant has minimum contacts with the forum such that suit there does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
Supporting sources
May a state prosecute crimes occurring entirely outside its borders?+
At common law a state possesses territorial jurisdiction only when conduct or its results occur inside its borders. Modern statutes sometimes extend jurisdiction on other bases, but the traditional territorial principle remains the starting point.
Supporting sources
of the forum State." We found in that case, however, that the property which was the basis for the assertion of in rem
jurisdiction
was not present in the State. We therefore did not have…
often small. But small and local authority may feel less sense of responsibility to the Constitution, and agencies of publicity may be less vigilant in calling it to account. The action of…
(pirates). Those accepted practices have for the most part, if not in their entirety, been enacted into United States statutory law, so that insofar as they are concerned the demise of the…
to its courts as it sees fit; and therefore that there is nothing sinister or constitutionally invalid in giving to a village mayor the
jurisdiction
of a justice of the peace to try…
EvidencePresentation of evidence · Introduction of evidenceUBEFoundational