Also known as:UCC 2-314 · U.C.C. § 2-314 · § 2-314 · implied warranty of merchantability
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A statutory implied warranty that goods sold by a merchant with respect to goods of that kind are merchantable. Goods satisfy the warranty when they pass without objection in the trade under the contract description, are fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used, and meet the remaining standards listed in the statute.
Sources & Authorities· 2 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Uniform Acts
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Invalid Disclaimer Attempt
Ulysses Maritime bought navigation units from Ultra Precision under a purchase order with no disclaimer language. Ultra Precision's confirmation added bold text disclaiming all implied warranties including merchantability. The disclaimer failed to mention merchantability explicitly and was not conspicuous, so the warranty of merchantability remained in force when the units later malfunctioned during ordinary voyages.
Software Failed Ordinary Use
Umar Underwood purchased software from a retail box. After installation the program repeatedly crashed on standard hardware during ordinary business tasks. Because the seller was a merchant dealing in software of that kind, the court held the goods unmerchantable under the warranty when they proved unfit for their ordinary purpose.
ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996)
Inconsistent Verdicts on Defect
Uliana Ustinova bought a sport utility vehicle that rolled over during an ordinary highway maneuver. A jury found the vehicle not defective under strict products liability yet found it unmerchantable under the warranty. The court held the verdicts could stand because the warranty reaches foreseeable but unintended uses that strict liability does not.
Denny v. Ford Motor Co.87 N.Y.2d 248, 639 N.Y.S.2d 250, 662 N.E.2d 730, 736 (1995)
Tool Design and Merchantability
Umeko Uchida used a pneumatic tool that vibrated excessively during normal operation and caused hand injury. Evidence showed the tool met industry standards yet lacked feasible safety features. The court treated the warranty claim as requiring proof that the tool failed ordinary-purpose fitness even if it passed trade standards.
Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.694 A.2d 1319, 1332, 1334-1335 (Conn. 1997)
Flexible Standard for Defect
Uma Underwood purchased flexible gas tubing that ruptured during ordinary residential use and caused a fire. The plaintiff offered alternative design evidence and consumer expectations proof. The court applied a risk-utility test to decide whether the tubing satisfied the merchantability warranty.
Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc.104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014)
Learned Intermediary Limits Warranty
Unity Underhill received a silicone breast implant that later leaked and caused illness. The manufacturer had warned the implanting surgeon of known risks. The court held that adequate warnings to the physician satisfied the merchantability obligation for prescription medical devices.
When does the implied warranty of merchantability arise under UCC § 2-314?+
The warranty arises automatically in a sale of goods if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind and the warranty has not been excluded or modified under § 2-316. Merchant status requires that the seller deal in goods of the kind or hold itself out as having knowledge or skill peculiar to the goods.
What must goods do to be merchantable under UCC § 2-314(2)?+
Goods must pass without objection in the trade under the contract description, be fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used, run within permitted variations of even kind quality and quantity, be adequately contained packaged and labeled, and conform to any promises on the container or label.
Does a broad disclaimer in a confirmation become part of the contract between merchants?+
A broad disclaimer of all implied warranties including merchantability materially alters the bargain and does not become part of the contract unless the buyer expressly agrees. The confirmation is treated as an acceptance with proposals that require separate acceptance when they materially alter the deal.
How does the merchantability warranty differ from strict products liability in tort?+
The warranty reaches goods unfit for ordinary purposes even if the product is not unreasonably dangerous, and it can cover foreseeable but unintended uses that strict liability may not reach. Some courts treat the standards as essentially identical while others allow inconsistent verdicts on the two theories.
What happens when goods perform adequately in testing but fail in actual field use?+
If the failures result from buyer misuse or failure to follow storage and calibration instructions rather than inherent defects at the time of sale, the goods remain merchantable. Performance under correct conditions satisfies the warranty even if misuse produces inconsistent results.
if the product is not fit for an unintended but reasonably foreseeable use. We conclude that it may. Plaintiffs Kay and Denny purchased a Ford Bronco II in 1985. The Bronco II was…
implied warranty of merchantability
to a third party. Id. , 373, 384. The Henningsen court stated: “We are convinced that the cause of justice in this area of the law can be served only by recognizing that [the third…
. Terex argues that Kirkbride failed to present sufficient admissible evidence to establish his three claims and that the jury was wrongly instructed on the
implied
-
warranty
claim.…
ContractsPerformance, breach, and discharge · Express and implied warranties in sale-of-goods contractsUBEFoundational