Also known as: Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act · UCCJEA
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A uniform act establishing standards for determining which state court has jurisdiction to make or modify child-custody determinations and for enforcing such determinations issued by other states. The act supplies home-state and significant-connection tests for initial jurisdiction and preserves exclusive continuing jurisdiction in the original forum until specified conditions are met. It also authorizes registration and enforcement of out-of-state orders while limiting modification authority to the court with continuing jurisdiction.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Urban Utley files an adoption petition in County C where his nonprofit employer is headquartered although he has lived for a decade in County D. The court must decide whether it may hear the case under state adoption venue rules because the UCCJEA does not govern adoption proceedings. After hearing arguments from the child's prior forum the court determines that the petition belongs in County D under the state's residency requirement.
Uma Upadhyay and her former spouse litigate custody after she relocates with the child to another state for an eighteen-month work assignment. The original court retains exclusive continuing jurisdiction because the other parent maintains periodic but recurring contacts there. The new state therefore lacks authority to modify the existing order even though the child has lived there for seven months.
A court lacking modification jurisdiction may still issue a temporary order that supplies specific dates and a clear end date so long as the order does not alter the substantive amount of visitation granted by the issuing court. The temporary order remains in effect only long enough for the party to seek relief from the court with continuing jurisdiction.
Supporting sources
The petition and order must be served by a method authorized by state law on both the respondent and any person who has physical custody of the child. Proper service on the respondent alone binds that party even if a nonparty physical custodian is not served.
…Indian”).[^maj-29] The majority’s interpretation of ICWA is also inconsistent with the views of 18 States that have adopted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The UCCJEA is a uniform act designed to avoid jurisdictional conflicts between States in child custody proceedings. See Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act §101…
…alleging, among other things, that the Alabama trial court lacked jurisdiction to make a child
Supporting sources
Exclusive continuing jurisdiction ends when the original court determines that neither the child nor the child and one parent has a significant connection with the state and that substantial evidence is no longer available there. Jurisdiction is also lost when a court determines that the child the parents and any person acting as a parent no longer reside in the state.
Supporting sources
An enforcing court may use ordinary judicial remedies such as contempt or make-up visitation that are available under its own law. It may not commandeer unrelated regulatory powers such as health permits or liquor licenses because those sanctions fall outside the cumulative enforcement authority contemplated by the act.
Supporting sources
A remote appearance constitutes participation but repeated connectivity failures that prevent a party from presenting evidence on a central issue deny that party a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The resulting order therefore lacks binding effect on the issues the party could not litigate.
Supporting sources