Search

Find the Case or the Term From Anywhere

Search sits in the navigation on every page, so looking up a case or a definition mid-study never means leaving what you were doing.

Free, no account needed

See Pricing

I find the case without leaving what I'm reading.

Omar N., 2L
4.9 out of 5 stars

Trusted by Law Students Nationwide

Attorney searching legal materials on a computer

Verifiable to the Source

Not AI slop. Prepared by attorneys.

Step 1 · Answered

This is a real Contracts question from our bank

ContractsContract formation and modification under the UCCLaw School

Riverside Hospital sent MedPro Supplies a signed purchase order for 5,000 disposable surgical gowns. The order said nothing about indemnity or dispute resolution. MedPro mailed back its standard confirmation, repeating quantity and price but adding an indemnity clause and a requirement that disputes be arbitrated. Both are merchants. MedPro delivered the gowns, Riverside paid, and the gowns were used. Riverside later claimed a shipment was defective and filed suit in court. MedPro demanded arbitration under its confirmation form.

In Riverside's lawsuit, is a court likely to require Riverside to arbitrate its dispute with MedPro based on the arbitration clause in MedPro's confirmation form?

  • AYes, because arbitration clauses are always enforceable to promote efficient dispute resolution.
  • BYes, because additional written terms automatically become part of every sale-of-goods contract.
  • CNo, because Riverside's purchase order expressly rejected all additional boilerplate terms.
  • DNo, because the arbitration clause is an additional term that may materially alter.

Correct · D

D is correct. This transaction is a sale of goods between merchants, so the battle of the forms rules apply. Riverside's signed purchase order was the offer. MedPro's confirmation was a definite expression of acceptance. It repeated the dickered terms but added indemnity and arbitration provisions. Those are "additional terms," not part of the original offer. Between merchants, additional terms can become part of the contract only if certain conditions are met. One key limitation is that an additional term will not be incorporated if it would materially alter the contract. Clauses that change how disputes are resolved, such as mandatory arbitration provisions and broad indemnity requirements, often have significant practical and legal consequences. Courts frequently treat them as material alterations because they surprise or substantially shift risk. Here, the parties formed a contract for gowns based on the matching terms of the order and confirmation, and they performed under that contract. The arbitration clause was only a proposal for an added term. Because it is the kind of term that may materially alter the bargain, a court is unlikely to treat it as having silently become part of the contract. Riverside therefore cannot be compelled to arbitrate based solely on MedPro's boilerplate.

Rule tested

UCC § 2-207(2)

The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:

Related authority

UCC § 2-207(1)

A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.

UCC § 2-207(2)(b)

they materially alter it; or

UCC § 2-207(3)

Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this Act.

What you actually get

One query

Cases and defined terms come back together.

One search reaches full case opinions and dictionary entries at the same time, labeled so you can tell instantly which is which. You rarely know in advance whether the thing you half-remember is a case name or a term of art.

Results

The part that matched is highlighted.

Your query is highlighted inside each case name and term, so a long result list is scannable at a glance instead of requiring you to reread every line to find why it came back.

Enough to choose

Enough context to pick the right result the first time.

Case results carry the citation and the exam-importance rating; term results carry pronunciation and part of speech. You decide from the result list rather than opening four tabs to find out which one you wanted.

Availability

It lives in the navigation bar on every page.

Search is reachable mid-reading, mid-quiz, and mid-cold-call, because that is when you need it. Nothing you were doing gets abandoned to look one thing up.

Common questions

Search, answered

Can I search case law for free?

Yes. A single AcedExams search covers full case opinions and legal dictionary entries, free and with no account, and labels each result so you can tell which is which.

What do the flames next to a case mean?

They are an exam-importance rating of one to three, computed from how often that case is cited across the AcedExams outlines. Case results also show the citation, and term results show pronunciation and part of speech, so you can pick the right result without opening several tabs.

See all FAQs →

Why trust this

How Search holds up

  • Searches our own attorney-written corpus of opinions and defined terms.
  • Used by law students at schools across the country
  • Used by candidates preparing for the bar exam
  • Used by attorneys who studied with it before admission
  • Recommended by practicing attorneys

We do not publish score or pass-rate claims. We have not run an outcomes study, and we will not imply results we have not measured.

Pairs with