Search
Search sits in the navigation on every page, so looking up a case or a definition mid-study never means leaving what you were doing.
Free, no account needed
“I find the case without leaving what I'm reading.”
Trusted by Law Students Nationwide

Verifiable to the Source
Step 1 · Answered
This is a real Contracts question from our bank
Riverside Hospital sent MedPro Supplies a signed purchase order for 5,000 disposable surgical gowns. The order said nothing about indemnity or dispute resolution. MedPro mailed back its standard confirmation, repeating quantity and price but adding an indemnity clause and a requirement that disputes be arbitrated. Both are merchants. MedPro delivered the gowns, Riverside paid, and the gowns were used. Riverside later claimed a shipment was defective and filed suit in court. MedPro demanded arbitration under its confirmation form.
In Riverside's lawsuit, is a court likely to require Riverside to arbitrate its dispute with MedPro based on the arbitration clause in MedPro's confirmation form?
Correct · D
D is correct. This transaction is a sale of goods between merchants, so the battle of the forms rules apply. Riverside's signed purchase order was the offer. MedPro's confirmation was a definite expression of acceptance. It repeated the dickered terms but added indemnity and arbitration provisions. Those are "additional terms," not part of the original offer. Between merchants, additional terms can become part of the contract only if certain conditions are met. One key limitation is that an additional term will not be incorporated if it would materially alter the contract. Clauses that change how disputes are resolved, such as mandatory arbitration provisions and broad indemnity requirements, often have significant practical and legal consequences. Courts frequently treat them as material alterations because they surprise or substantially shift risk. Here, the parties formed a contract for gowns based on the matching terms of the order and confirmation, and they performed under that contract. The arbitration clause was only a proposal for an added term. Because it is the kind of term that may materially alter the bargain, a court is unlikely to treat it as having silently become part of the contract. Riverside therefore cannot be compelled to arbitrate based solely on MedPro's boilerplate.
Rule tested
UCC § 2-207(2)
The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:
Related authority
UCC § 2-207(1)
A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
UCC § 2-207(2)(b)
they materially alter it; or
UCC § 2-207(3)
Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this Act.
What you actually get
One query
One search reaches full case opinions and dictionary entries at the same time, labeled so you can tell instantly which is which. You rarely know in advance whether the thing you half-remember is a case name or a term of art.
Results
Your query is highlighted inside each case name and term, so a long result list is scannable at a glance instead of requiring you to reread every line to find why it came back.
Enough to choose
Case results carry the citation and the exam-importance rating; term results carry pronunciation and part of speech. You decide from the result list rather than opening four tabs to find out which one you wanted.
Availability
Search is reachable mid-reading, mid-quiz, and mid-cold-call, because that is when you need it. Nothing you were doing gets abandoned to look one thing up.
Common questions
Why trust this
We do not publish score or pass-rate claims. We have not run an outcomes study, and we will not imply results we have not measured.
Full opinions plus expert analysis, with citations that jump to the supporting passage.
Free on Basic. No account needed to read.
Terms defined with sourced authorities, examples, and the cases that use them.
Free, no account needed
Clear written explanations of every concept, with cited rules and comprehension checks inline.
Free to read, no account needed. Answering checks requires a free account.