Also known as: abandonment defences · abandonment-defense · abandonment
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An affirmative defense in criminal law excusing liability for attempt or conspiracy when the defendant voluntarily and completely renounces the criminal purpose before the offense is completed. The defense requires that the renunciation originate with the defendant and not be prompted by increased risk of detection or a decision to postpone the crime.
Amber Alonzo mixed a restricted pesticide into grain and poured it into a portable tank, then carried the bucket toward the cattle pens. She dumped the mixture only after a supervisor approached. Because she had already performed an overt act with intent, her later change of heart supplied no defense to attempt under the common law rule.
Anita Ali adjusted an automated feeder timer to release poison after she left the farm. Moments later she dismantled the timer and removed the mixture, acting solely because she decided the plan was wrong. Her complete and voluntary abandonment prevented commission of the crime and established the Model Penal Code defense.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Albert Allen purchased materials and began constructing an explosive device to damage property. After completing the purchase he contacted police and disclosed the plan, acting solely from a change of heart. His complete and voluntary abandonment supplied the Model Penal Code defense to attempt.
Antonio Alvarado loaded a vehicle with equipment to commit arson at a rival business. Moments later he unloaded the equipment and drove away, motivated only by his own moral reconsideration. The complete voluntary renunciation established the defense under the Model Penal Code.
Alexandra Armstrong acquired chemicals and scouted a target location for a planned theft. She later disposed of the chemicals and abandoned the plan without any increased risk of detection. Her voluntary and complete renunciation prevented liability for attempt.
Alice Atkins recruited an accomplice and obtained a weapon for a planned robbery. She then informed the accomplice she would not proceed and destroyed the weapon, acting solely from internal renunciation. The complete voluntary abandonment defeated attempt liability.
No. Under the majority and traditional common law rule, abandonment or withdrawal does not provide a defense to attempt once the defendant has crossed the line from mere preparation to the commission of an overt act.
Supporting sources
The defendant must prove that he abandoned his effort or prevented commission of the crime under circumstances manifesting a complete and voluntary renunciation of criminal purpose. Renunciation is not voluntary if motivated by increased probability of detection.
Supporting sources
Under the Model Penal Code an overt act does not automatically bar the defense if the defendant later prevents commission of the crime through a complete and voluntary renunciation of criminal purpose.
Supporting sources
No. Renunciation is not voluntary if motivated in whole or in part by circumstances that increase the probability of detection or make the crime more difficult to accomplish.
Supporting sources
Yes. The same voluntary and complete renunciation that defeats attempt liability also defeats conspiracy liability when the defendant abandons the criminal purpose before the object offense is committed.
Supporting sources
…discussion of the original understanding and our first century and a half of case law does not necessarily require a wholesale abandonment of our more recent opinions. It simply reveals that our substantial effects test is far removed from both the Constitution and from our early case law and that the Court's opinion should…