Also known as:abridges · abridged · abridging · abridgment · abridgements · abridgement
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
To reduce or diminish the scope or availability of a right or interest. The term captures both outright prohibitions and measures that intentionally burden exercise of the right on a prohibited basis.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
State Limits Speech Permits
The city council enacts an ordinance requiring advance approval and a substantial fee for any public speech criticizing local officials. Alice Atkins applies for a permit to speak at a rally but is told the fee must be paid first. The ordinance abridges protected speech by imposing a prior restraint and financial barrier that deters expression.
Federal Rule Displaces State Bar
Maria files a diversity class action in federal court seeking interest on security deposits under New York law. A state statute bars representative actions for these claims. The federal court applies Rule 23 to certify the class because the federal rule governs procedure and does not abridge any substantive right created by state law.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Restatements
Dictionaries
State Denies Benefits by Race
A state welfare statute conditions cash assistance on one year of residency and excludes recent arrivals who are predominantly of color. Adrian Aguilar, a new resident denied benefits, challenges the rule. The statute abridges privileges of citizenship by imposing a burden that effectively withholds equal protection on account of race.
Paid Leave Only for Men
A city ordinance grants two hours of paid election-day leave solely to male manufacturing workers. Female employees such as Ariana Azizi must take unpaid time or lose wages to vote. The ordinance abridges the right to vote on account of sex by creating a sex-based financial obstacle to participation.
Residency Rule Excludes Workers
An irrigation district adopts a year-round residency requirement for voting eligibility. Seasonal migrant workers of color who live on farms only during harvest are excluded. Ava Adebayo, a worker denied a ballot, shows the rule abridges the franchise on account of race by systematically removing a class of citizens from the electorate.
Zoning Limits Family Choice
A city ordinance defines family so narrowly that a grandmother cannot live with her grandchildren. Aaron Adams challenges enforcement of the rule against his extended household. The ordinance abridges the freedom of related family members to live together by intruding on personal choice without constitutional justification.
Moore v. City of East Cleveland, Ohio431 U.S. 494, 503 (1977)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
Does abridgment require an outright ban on a right or can it include burdens that make exercise more difficult?+
Abridgment reaches both outright prohibitions and intentional measures that burden or diminish exercise of the right. Legislative history showing a purpose to make registration or voting harder for a protected class establishes an abridgment even when formal eligibility remains intact.
Supporting sources
How does the Rules Enabling Act limit federal rules that might abridge substantive rights?+
A federal rule is valid only if it regulates procedure and does not abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right. When Rule 23 conflicts with a state bar on representative actions, the federal rule controls because it addresses the manner of litigation without changing the underlying claim to interest on deposits.
Supporting sources
What distinguishes denial from abridgment under voting-rights amendments?+
Denial eliminates the right entirely while abridgment includes any intentional scheme that burdens or diminishes the ability to exercise the franchise on a prohibited basis such as sex or race. A facially neutral rule adopted to make voting more difficult for women constitutes an abridgment even if women can still vote through a more onerous process.
Supporting sources
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…in the present case, have held state laws unconstitutional, at least in part, because of vagueness or because of overbreadth and abridgment of rights. Abele v. Markle , 342 F. Supp. 800 (Conn. 1972), appeal docketed, No. 72-56; Abele v. Markle , 351 F. Supp. 224 (Conn. 1972), appeal docketed, No. 72-730; Doe v.…