Also known as:accessories before the fact · accessory before fact
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A participant in a felony at common law who aids, abets, or encourages the commission of the crime but is not present at the scene when the crime occurs.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Offsite Planning of Pipeline Tap
Anita Ali met with a field operator weeks before the planned tampering and supplied a detailed diagram plus specialized tools. She remained miles away while the operator cut into the pipeline at night. Because her advance assistance enabled the felony without her presence at the scene, she qualifies as an accessory before the fact.
Remote Encouragement of Forgery
Antonio Alvarado told an associate days earlier that shortcuts on a court filing would go undetected. He stayed away from the office while the associate forged the judge's signature. His prior encouragement of the felony without presence at the act makes him an accessory before the fact.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Common Law
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
Aaron Adams sold goods to a buyer knowing the buyer would transport them across state lines. Adams remained absent from the actual transportation. His contribution of the goods that enabled the interstate felony without presence at the scene establishes accessory-before-the-fact liability.
Backun v. United States112 F.2d 635, 637 (4th Cir. 1940)
Telegraph Message Aiding Murder
Anika Anand sent a message directing others to intercept a warning that would have saved the victim's life. She stayed away from the location of the killing. Her pre-crime aid without presence at the homicide renders her an accessory before the fact.
State ex. rel. Attorney General v. Tally102 Ala. 25, 15 So. 722, 739 (1894)
Offsite Direction of Conspiracy
Austin Abbott gave instructions from another jurisdiction that furthered the unlawful scheme. He never entered the state where the overt acts occurred. His remote encouragement of the felony without presence supports accessory-before-the-fact status.
Hyde v. United States225 U.S. 347, 369
Waiting Driver in Robbery Scheme
Adam Anderson waited in a car several hundred feet from the victims' home while accomplices committed the robbery and murder. He supplied no aid at the immediate scene of the killings. His role as the planned getaway driver without presence at the homicide makes him an accessory before the fact.
Enmund v. Florida458 U.S. 782, 102 S.Ct. 3368, 73 L.Ed.2d 1140 (1982)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What distinguishes an accessory before the fact from a principal in the second degree?+
The key distinction is presence at the scene. A principal in the second degree must aid or encourage while actually or constructively present. An accessory before the fact provides the same type of aid but remains absent when the crime occurs.
Supporting sources
Does an accessory before the fact need to be convicted only after the principal?+
At common law an accessory before the fact could not be tried or convicted until the principal had first been convicted. Modern statutes in most jurisdictions have eliminated this procedural requirement.
Supporting sources
Can words alone make someone an accessory before the fact?+
Yes. Encouragement or counseling given in advance satisfies the aiding or abetting element even without physical assistance or presence at the scene.
Supporting sources
Is supplying tools or plans weeks earlier enough for accessory liability?+
Yes. Providing a diagram, tools, or detailed instructions in advance constitutes aiding or encouraging the crime when the supplier stays away from the scene.
Supporting sources
458 U.S. 782, 102 S. Ct. 3368, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1140 (1982)Criminal Law
…1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 878 (1977). Although petitioner could be convicted of second-degree murder only if he were an accessory before the fact rather than a principal, the Florida Supreme Court reasoned: "[T]he only evidence of the degree of his participation is the jury's likely inference that he was the person in the car by…