Also known as: adequately provoked · provocation
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A circumstance or event that would cause an ordinary person to experience sudden and intense passion sufficient to overwhelm self-control. The provocation must actually arouse such passion in the defendant. No reasonable cooling-off period may intervene between the provocation and the killing, and the defendant must in fact not have cooled off.
Andrew Avery returns home early from work and finds his wife in bed with another man. Overcome by sudden rage, Andrew immediately grabs a nearby object and strikes the man, causing fatal injuries. The discovery of the spouse in the act of adultery supplies the required provocation that reduces the killing from murder to voluntary manslaughter.
Ava Adebayo repeatedly insults and threatens Atlas Ventures' project manager during a contract negotiation. The manager responds by shoving Ava, causing a minor injury. Ava recovers full compensatory damages for the harm, but the court considers her own provocative conduct when deciding whether to award or reduce punitive damages.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Alan Ackerman and his coworker argue over a past work assignment. The coworker calls Alan several insulting names. Alan then strikes and kills the coworker. The verbal insults alone constitute inadequate provocation and leave the killing as murder rather than voluntary manslaughter.
Angela Acosta is struck without warning by a heavy object thrown by her neighbor during a property dispute. Still in the grip of sudden rage, Angela immediately stabs the neighbor, causing death. The serious battery inflicted on Angela supplies adequate provocation that mitigates the intentional killing to voluntary manslaughter.
Anthony Arnold learns that his brother was beaten by a rival gang member. Anthony waits two hours, obtains a weapon, and then kills the rival. The passage of time allows a reasonable person to cool off, so the earlier battery does not constitute adequate provocation that reduces the killing to voluntary manslaughter.
Alexandra Armstrong is seriously battered by her estranged husband during an argument. She immediately retrieves a knife and stabs him fatally while still experiencing the provoked passion. Because Alexandra did not cool off between the battery and the killing, the provocation remains adequate and supports a voluntary-manslaughter verdict.
Common law recognizes serious battery inflicted on the defendant or a close relative and catching one's spouse in the act of adultery as adequate provocation. Courts also recognize threats of deadly force. Mere words, trivial battery, and provocation based on long-past wrongs remain legally inadequate.
Provocation does not reduce compensatory damages because those damages compensate for the actual injury caused by the defendant's tortious conduct. The same provocation may be considered when deciding whether to award punitive damages or in what amount because it bears on the defendant's blameworthiness.
The provocation must be of a kind that would cause an ordinary person to experience sudden and intense passion. The defendant must in fact have experienced that passion. There must not have been sufficient time for a reasonable person to cool off. The defendant must in fact not have cooled off before the killing.
…Fourteenth Amendment requires the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of the heat of passion on sudden provocation when the issue is properly presented in a homicide case. In that case, a Maine jury had been instructed that if the State established that the homicide was both intentional and unlawful,…